Wednesday 17th of September 2025

transparent display of strength as a signal to the world....

China’s recent display of its newly acquired military might surprised not only international observers, but also its own seasoned diplomats.

As Fu Ying, the former ambassador to Australia and the UK, told the Financial Review Asia Summit this week, she had not realised how far China’s military capacity had advanced.

 

Geoff Raby

China’s giant military parade didn’t surprise just the West

 

She told the conference that she “really felt very proud for my country. I think such a … transparent display of strength is a strong signal to the world about the country’s determination and growing capability to prevent the return of the humiliation of the past”.

She also emphasised that its regional neighbours had attended the parade, many after participating in the Shanghai Co-operation Organisation Summit, held in Tianjin, a few days earlier. It was the Chinese Government’s view that China’s relationship with its neighbours was “at its best … in modern times”.

The Philippine Government would certainly reject this conclusion, but elsewhere, Beijing has worked hard to turn around negative views of China that resulted from its period of “Wolf Warrior diplomacy” – an act of self-harm.

Fu was at pains — both in her remarks to the summit and in private conversations — to assuage concerns about China’s startling display of military hardware. Instead, she argued that its leadership was primarily focused on internal affairs.

As in all political systems, different views prevail at different times. Fu represents more of the less abrasively nationalistic strand of China’s foreign and security policy establishment. In this, she belongs squarely in the Deng Xiaoping stream of building strength and capability while avoiding conflict.

Consistent with that, it is not surprising that she highlighted the range of domestic policy challenges Beijing must address as priorities. These included sluggish economic growth, high youth unemployment, huge local government debt, decarbonisation and deleveraging the property sector.

Although the military parade caught the world’s attention, as it was intended to do, the domestic audience was an even more important one.

Such parades are intended to burnish the leader’s authority. Not only is Xi Jinping China’s President and Communist Party general secretary, he is also chairman of the Central Military Commission. He can take personal responsibility for the dazzling display of China’s might.

This should also end the vacuous recent foreign-sourced rumours of Xi’s demise. In one week, he not only gathered many countries to the SCO meeting but also followed this up with a huge parade. The recent string of sackings of his senior military leaders, apparently for “corruption”, hardly suggests his authority is under challenge when viewed against these events.

Arguably, China already enjoys regional hegemony. And with its economy expected to continue to grow at about 5% each year for some time to come, its power and influence will rise accordingly.

We do not know what sort of hegemony China will exhibit, but it is unlikely to be one like the European colonial powers and perhaps less interventionist than the US. With the experience of Russia’s severe setbacks with its invasion of Ukraine across a contiguous land boundary, a maritime invasion of Taiwan, or even a blockade, may be out of reach for Beijing.

Beijing’s ambitions seem to be to continue strengthening its role and influence in the United Nations and to work through multilateral and regional forums to advance its interests.

The message being sent to Australian policymakers is that they must learn to live with a stronger and more confident China and manage things in the best way they can to advance their interests.

If the _Politico_ reports from Washington during the week are correct, Australia will be doing this without much support from the US. Apparently, senior Department of War officials are suggesting that homeland defence and the Western hemisphere replace China as the US’ principal threat. This would also seem to be consistent with Donald Trump’s instincts.

Fu’s observation, that there is still quite a bit of underlying tension in the Australia-China relationship, suggests that Beijing believes more can be done to improve relations.

In a quite candid comment at the summit, she said, “Some Australians gave the Chinese the feeling that they would shake hands with China on the table and kick China under the table.”

This goes to the heart of Australia’s foreign policy dilemma with China. It has always been there, but the tension between our commercial interests on one hand and our security perceptions on the other continues to grow.

Nonetheless, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has skilfully corrected Australia’s China policy and put the relationship back on track. His recent visit to Beijing served to reinforce the message that it is back to normal. His government’s management of the relationship has been disciplined, and the megaphone diplomacy has been shelved.

It is now imperative that Foreign Minister Penny Wong has talking points retyped by the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade to do away with the rhetoric of “stabilisation”. What is required is for Australia to recognise that it has agency when dealing with a powerful China and to begin to adopt ambitious, forward-looking initiatives that usefully advance common bilateral interests.

Fu suggested greater co-operation in health, medical science and artificial intelligence. But a forward, ambitious agenda could also include areas such as energy and decarbonisation, regional security and new avenues for regional trade liberalisation and facilitation.

These need not be exclusively between the two countries, but bilateral engagement with the major power of the region would be a good place to start. Australia once had confidence in its agency and led on many significant regional initiatives – from creating APEC, to the Cambodian peace settlement and the Bali process on people smuggling.

It is time to face the reality of Australia’s new security environment and see it as full of opportunity rather than risks.

 

Republished from Australian Financial Review, 12 September 2025

https://johnmenadue.com/post/2025/09/chinas-giant-military-parade-didnt-surprise-just-the-west/

 

YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT.

 

         Gus Leonisky

         POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.

confucius....

 

Jocelyn Chey

Confucius Institute decline signals China’s soft power shift

 

While Chinese soft power is thriving in the so-called “Global South”, it is waning elsewhere.

This is illustrated by mapping the growth and decline of the Confucius Institutes – Beijing’s state-sponsored cultural and educational promotion programs.

The geographical divide is exacerbated by the increasingly confrontational US-China relationship. Beijing has recalibrated its soft power strategies in response to the new international security environment and these efforts have achieved greater success in BRICS and Global South countries than in Australia and other Western nations.

The language and culture programs delivered through the Confucius Institutes have not disappeared in the West – but their proliferation is no longer a key element of China’s soft power activities in those countries. Many iterations of the once-flourishing program have been closed or are dormant. In Beijing, the soft power work of the Ministry of Education is divided between their subordinate non-government organisation — the Chinese International Education Foundation — and the overseas China Cultural Centres of the Ministry of Culture and Tourism.

The shift follows significant leadership changes since the program was inaugurated in 2004 and the modification of national priorities under the 14th Five-Year Plan, which was adopted in 2021. The Ministry of Education adopted 10 “key tasks” under China’s Education Modernisation 2035 Plan. International education and the Confucius Institutes ranked second last in this plan’s prioritisation.

The Ministry of Culture and Tourism, formed from the 2018 merger of the Ministry of Culture and the National Tourism Administration, is committed to the Five-Year Plan’s exhortation to promote socialist culture, build a culturally strong nation, promote quality cultural tourism and leverage culture for national development. The Guangxi Tea Culture exhibition and performance in Sydney, Australia, in July 2025, demonstrate the Ministry’s linkage of culture and tourism by offering tour packages to tea plantations in ethnic minority areas of Guangxi Province.

Cultural promotion abroad through education, science, literature and the arts has long been a priority for China and Beijing has focused on increasing its cultural influence in those Western countries that influenced the development of its own modern culture as a matter of national pride.

The Confucius Institute and China Cultural Centre programs aim to uphold President Xi Jinping’s instruction to “tell China’s story well” – to present China and its culture positively in support of the government’s international objectives.

Each Confucius Institute is established by agreement and under the administration of individual universities in China and the host country. This arrangement was intended to provide scholastic credibility and integrity. But this has led some critics to suspect intentions to interfere with academic freedoms in Western countries and has been a root cause of the program’s decline.

The program also encourages foreign students to study in colleges and universities in China. This has limited appeal for Australian students. Though most universities have study-abroad programs, few have active exchange arrangements with universities in China. Chinese language study is generally declining in Australia – except for students from families with a Chinese-language background.

Chinese-study graduates often report a lack of interest in their language skills from prospective employers and difficulty finding jobs to apply their skills. Canberra encourages Asian language skills through the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade’s New Colombo Plan – in which China is an eligible host location, but cautionary Smart Traveller advice can be a deterrent to applicants. The Foreign Influence Transparency Scheme Act 2018 has made university administrators hesitant to renew or develop ties with Chinese universities.

The Chinese government has noted the various disincentives for students considering Chinese studies and the surging currents of anti-China sentiment in some parts of the Western world. As such, Beijing has focused its efforts on Asian and African countries where public sentiment towards China is more positive.

International student numbers in China remain below the pre-COVID-19 pandemic peak, though they exceeded 200,000 in 2023. Many of these students were from the Global South, drawn by Chinese Government scholarships, relatively low fees and highly ranked universities.

Confucius Institute programs are linked with China’s influential and expanding Belt and Road Initiative. Education exchanges and the promotion of the Chinese language are cornerstones of the country’s international communications strategy and its attempts to expand its influence in host countries. The 44 Confucius Institutes in Latin America and 61 in Africa provide basic and advanced language training and offer scholarships for graduates planning to enrol in Chinese universities.

Program graduates also often look for employment with local Chinese companies or on aid projects. The soft power narrative of China as a rising power has been replaced by the promotion of the “community of shared destiny”. China’s revamped public narrative suggests that it wishes to be supportive of other countries’ development and will not dictate terms and conditions as the colonial powers once did.

This narrative has not found traction in Western countries. Whether tourism and cultural exchange will succeed in winning hearts and minds remains to be seen.

https://eastasiaforum.org/2025/09/13/confucius-institute-decline-signals-chinas-soft-power-shift/

 

READ FROM TOP.

 

YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT.

 

         Gus Leonisky

         POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.

 

 

doing well.....

 How Bad is Chinese Economy? Walk Through Guangzhou Reveals the TRUTH!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OvxFpbIgBzQ

 

READ FROM TOP.

 

YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT.

 

         Gus Leonisky

         POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.

 

SEE ALSO: red lines....