SearchRecent comments
Democracy LinksMember's Off-site Blogs |
trump wandered into a war there was never any chance of winning....
I was talking to an investor friend the other day, asking whether I should get into one of these price-lock arrangements with the people who supply our heating oil. He usually has sound answers to these kinds of questions, but this time I could practically hear him shrug over the telephone as he said in anxious tones, “How’s Trump going to end this!? He has no way out. It’s rattling the markets now. What’s the way forward? Nobody can see an exit plan.”
PATRICK LAWRENCE: Only One Way Out for Trump July 27, 2026 [The question ahead of the latest summit with Netanyahu on Tuesday is what the U.S. president will lose — either a war, on the one hand, or on the other, the global economy and the American electorate.]
Donald J. Trump can’t either, it seems. Obliging the Zionists who own him, Trump wandered into a war there was never any chance of winning, and the military option seems to be collapsing as we speak. He has betrayed the Iranians so often they have shut down all diplomatic channels. The Trumpster doesn’t even know how to lose this reckless war: This is the net of it, so it seems to me. I have seen Washington pols out on limbs before, usually having got there by way of their own foolish machinations and miscalculations. Rarely, if ever, have I seen a political figure crawl out on one and turn to saw it off as he or she sits there. All last week Trump continued to threaten a major escalation of the war he let Bibi Netanyahu talk him into starting last February. “Next week it gets really bad for them,” Trump said in a Fox News interview broadcast in mid–July, “next week” being the week just passed. “We’re going to knock out all their power plants. We’re going to knock out all their bridges unless they get to the table and negotiate.” Last Friday, with no one at the table, Trump told Barak Ravid, the White House’s Zionist mouthpiece at Axios, “I am considering a massive attack. Bigger than ever before. I am close to making a decision.” A day later, following a conference with military advisers and members of his cabinet, Trump’s decision turned out to be no knocking out of anything. It is coming out now that the U.S. military is running low on weapons — air-defense systems, “stand-off” missiles, etc. — and running very low on petroleum reserves. The New York Times, in the cotton-wool English it has perfected over the decades, reported as follows in its Saturday editions: “President Trump has set aside, at least for now, plans to sharply escalate the American military assault against Iran, with particular concern that intensifying the war could dangerously drain the Pentagon’s already diminished stockpile of Patriot antimissile interceptors and other air-defense munitions in the Middle East. The threat to interceptor stockpiles is one of many considerations that have made a return to major combat operations a hugely risky endeavor, administration officials say. Mr. Trump and his top aides are also uneasy about the prospect of a widening war in the Middle East, the alienation of key Gulf allies who are vulnerable to Iranian attack, a global economic crunch, and growing energy and refugee crises.” This is not what I’m reading other than in the Times. I’m reading that senior Pentagon officials with heads on their shoulders, which excludes Pete “High–T” Hegseth, the defense secretary, are clamoring for the White House to bail out of the war with Iran because the U.S. military finds itself perilously out of its depth. Barak Ravid — him again — reported in Axios last week that Brad Cooper, who heads the Central Command, has told the White House it is time to stop the bombing campaign “because it has reached the limit of its effectiveness.” A Major Moment This is a big moment. Reporting out of Washington has it that the Trumpster has abruptly discovered the limits of his power and this sits very badly with him. This is true on both counts but not the half of it. It is the late-phase imperium that has slammed into the limits of its potency, and it would be hard to overstate the world-historical significance of this new reality. In the way of limits, the United States has relied on drawdowns from its Strategic Petroleum Reserves to control oil prices and defer the crisis to come in available supplies, but this finger-in-the-dike strategy now reaches the point it is no longer tenable. Releases from the S.P.R. since the U.S.–Israeli aggression began on Feb. 28 come to 172 million barrels. This leaves the reserve at about 300 million barrels, against a legally mandated minimum of 250 million barrels. You do the math, as they say: This is simply not a sustainable circumstance. I am reminded of that old, bitter line in The Sun Also Rises. “How did you go bankrupt?” one of Hemingway’s characters asks another. “Two ways. Gradually, then suddenly.” The Trump regime seems headed from the first way to the second. Karl Miller, a conservative commentator on economics and geopolitics — the Washington Examiner, the Manhattan Institute — added a telling detail to this arithmetic in a report that comes to me via Larry Johnson’s Sonar 21 website. Miller describes a Pentagon operation to purchase fuel and send abroad a good deal of what it purchases. This is covert and therefore unaccountable, as so much of what the U.S. military does, turns out to be. From May to July, Miller writes, the Pentagon sent overseas some 160 million barrels of product, distillate and jet fuel, to keep its operation in West Asia running. I cannot confirm Miller’s numbers. But unless I am missing something, by his research and calculations the U.S. war machine’s consumption in just these past three months is the equivalent of 90–odd percent of the S.P.R.’s drawdown since the war began. I am not surprised to read that Trump, as of his retreat from his “massive attack” last Friday, is now talking about negotiating a new ceasefire agreement with those he recently referred to as “scum.” An Axios report over the weekend (and what would the Trump regime do without Axios?) quoted Trump saying, “We’re talking to [the Iranians] right now. I think they’re getting more and more serious as the days go by. We’re locked and loaded and ready to go, but we’re talking to them.” Locked and loaded, we’re talking to them: This makes two bits of nonsense in one sentence. As it now develops, the United States is neither locked and loaded because it does not have enough in the inventories to lock and load, nor, certainly, is it talking to the Iranians for the simple reason they have point-blank declined any further negotiations with the Trump regime. From The Hormuz Letter’s post on “X” after Trump announced his retreat last Friday: “The cancellation came despite Iran comprehensively rejecting any negotiations with the U.S. throughout this week and confirming it is not talking to the U.S. under any circumstances, and came directly after Trump claimed Iran is talking to the U.S. and that major progress is being made. The decision also followed an Omani delegation arriving in Tehran for talks on a new arrangement to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, with Trump claiming additional progress there, though Iran denies any talks are taking place. Additionally, a source close to Iran’s [Mohammad Bagher] Ghalibaf assesses the operational silence of the past 15 hours as a prelude to an intensification of attacks and not a new attempt at negotiations, with the U.S. military still preparing plans for a return to major combat operations.” This is the price the Trump regime pays for the president’s insistence that two greed-head New York landlords, Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, the one a friend from property dealings the other his son-in-law, are qualified to conduct diplomatic negotiations with Iran, Russia and who knows who else. I always knew Trump’s vulgar contempt for expertise and his primitive understanding of statecraft would come at a cost. Now he is paying it. Treading Water With Zionists Trump cannot even conduct a war, to say nothing of winning it, and the adversary refuses to speak to him because his serial betrayals have devastated the trust that is essential to effective diplomatic contacts. Nowhere to run to, nowhere to hide, it seems. Trump is stuck, even, with the Zionist regime. As Bibi Netanyahu’s latest summit with Trump drew near, the speculation was that the Israeli PM would persuade the ever-manipulable Trump to restart the military operation and the Israelis would rejoin it. Trump preempted Bibi with his retreat last Friday, the timing of which was surely calculated to anticipate Netanyahu’s arrival Tuesday. Trump should listen to Zo, as The New York Post delightfully calls the mayor of New York, and arrest Bibi when he steps onto the White House portico Tuesday. But for the moment, the regime seems to be treading water with the Zionists. This in itself looks to me a subtle turn in U.S.–Israeli relations, about which more in a moment. What will the Trumpster do? This is the question on many minds just now. In brief, Trump is going to have to decide what it is he will lose and then figure out how to lose it — either a war, on the one hand, or on the other the global economy, the American electorate and the midterm elections. My immediate answer: While Trump does not like to lose anything, he will lose a war that has so far remained regional but appears on the brink of enlarging. As of this past weekend he seems to accept that he cannot win this one because he can no longer fight it, and the economic consequences of continuing it are about to become unmanageable. Trump’s larger war — in his mind, where everything that matters to him takes place — is for a “legacy” he seems to think merits him a place on Mount Rushmore. This is the war he will wage now. Accepting defeat in the Iran war will be a messy schmear the American public cannot read for what it is, and it will never be called a defeat. In my view we are in for some variant of “peace with honor” — another name for the other side’s victory, as coined after Vietnam’s triumph in 1975. When and how this is presented remains to be seen, but I do not see any alternative open to Donald J, Trump. There is a large implication here that must not be missed. If Trump chooses this way back from the limb he crawled out on, what is already apparent as a new divide between Washington and the Zionist rxegime will grow significantly wider. I have previously argued in this space and in The Floutist that Trump would continue aggressing against Iran because he has been so thoroughly a captive of the Israelis. For Trump it was Israel über alles, as I put it earlier in the war. But there now seems to be no more obliging the psychotic, war-obsessed Netanyahu and all the monied Zionists Trump has served until now. If he betrays them — and absent a a crystal ball or a Ouija board I expect him to do so out of sheer self-interest — we will at that moment be witnessing the making of history. Patrick Lawrence, a correspondent abroad for many years, chiefly for the International Herald Tribune, is a columnist, essayist, lecturer and author, most recently of Journalists and Their Shadows, available from Clarity Press or via Amazon. Other books include Time No Longer: Americans After the American Century. His Twitter account, @thefloutist, has been restored after years of being censored. TO MY READERS. Independent publications and those who write for them reach a moment that is difficult and full of promise all at once. On one hand, we assume ever greater responsibilities in the face of mainstream media’s mounting derelictions. On the other, we have found no sustaining revenue model and so must turn directly to our readers for support. I am committed to independent journalism for the duration: I see no other future for American media. But the path grows steeper, and as it does I need your help. This grows urgent now. In recognition of the commitment to independent journalism, please subscribe to The Floutist, or via my Patreon account. https://consortiumnews.com/2026/07/27/patrick-lawrence-only-one-way-out-for-trump/
PLEASE VISIT: YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT — SINCE 2005. Gus Leonisky POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951. RABID ATHEIST. WELCOME TO THIS INSANE WORLD….
|
User login |
bombing....
The US has launched a “powerful” bombing raid against Iran after President Donald Trump warned that it was “our turn to hit them,” following Tehran’s ballistic missile attack on American forces in Jordan the previous night.
US Central Command said the new strikes began at 8pm Eastern Time on Wednesday.
“The strikes are a powerful response to yesterday’s attempted Iranian attacks on US forces based in the Middle East,” CENTCOM announced.
The command did not immediately identify the targets, disclose how many aircraft or missiles were involved, or say how long the operation was expected to continue.
Iranian media reported explosions across several southern regions shortly after the US operation began. Press TV said areas around the southwestern city of Abadan had come under missile strikes, while blasts were also heard on Qeshm Island and in the southern port city of Bushehr. There were no immediate reports of casualties or details about the facilities targeted.
Trump had warned earlier on Wednesday that Iran was about to face a harsh response, reportedly telling Fox News: “We’re going to beat the f***ing s**t out of them.”
Speaking later at the White House, Trump said Iran had fired five missiles at American forces and credited US Patriot air-defense systems with intercepting all of them. “We’re going to be hitting them very hard because it’s our turn to hit them,” he added.
CENTCOM described Tuesday’s missile launch as an attempted “surprise attack,” claiming that all the incoming projectiles had been intercepted. The command did not initially mention Jordan, saying only that the missiles had targeted US forces “based in the Middle East.”
The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps later claimed responsibility for the attack. The IRGC said it was responding to “aggressive actions” by the US military and warned that its operations would continue as long as Washington persisted with what it called “illegal and malicious actions” against Iranian interests.
The renewed US bombing ended a brief pause that began after Trump suspended a 13-night campaign of strikes last Friday to allow negotiations with Tehran to proceed. He had warned, however, that military action would resume if diplomacy failed.
https://www.rt.com/news/643642-us-bombs-iran-trump/
READ FROM TOP.
PLEASE VISIT:
YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT — SINCE 2005.
Gus Leonisky
POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.
RABID ATHEIST.
WELCOME TO THIS INSANE WORLD….
rich....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cI6kFf94svU
Show Off Your Love for Trump with the Presidential Neck Vag! | The Daily ShowREAD FROM TOP.
PLEASE VISIT:
YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT — SINCE 2005.
Gus Leonisky
POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.
RABID ATHEIST.
WELCOME TO THIS INSANE WORLD….
deranged.....
US Merges Wars in Eurasia, West Asia
M.K. Bhadrakumar says that by linking the wars in Iran and Ukraine, the U.S. opened a theater of conflict around the Caspian Sea.
On Friday, even as U.S. President Donald Trump was announcing the end of the latest round of the conflict with Iran, the Pentagon unobtrusively extended the war theatre to the Caspian Sea in a hugely consequential geopolitical thrust.
The incident hardly figured in the Western news cycle.
But CGTN (China Global Television Network), perhaps sensing that the U.S. could be stealthily spreading its war to the Caspian region, reported on July 25,
“U.S. missiles struck a Revolutionary Guards Navy headquarters in the Ziba Kenar area of the Caspian Sea province of Gilan, according to a security official in Gilan quoted by Iranian media. Provincial authorities said U.S. projectiles had also struck the port city of Bandar Anzali, according to the Iranian Labor News Agency.”
Gilan province, which has a Caspian coastline borders Azerbaijan in the west, with which Iran has had a troubled relationship in the recent years following the Transcaucasian region’s geopolitical gravitation towards the Western orbit. Unsurprisingly, Russia’s ties with Azerbaijan and Armenia also have suffered a severe erosion following the ascendance of U.S. (and NATO) influence in Transcaucasia.
Trump is the new sheriff in town in Baku and Yerevan with Turkey’s President Recep Erdogan playing the role of undersheriff. To add to the complexity, Azerbaijan is a close ally of Turkey, and Turkey’s ties with Moscow have been strained in recent years by the covert takeover in Syria by Al-Qaeda affiliates backed by Ankara.
On the other hand, Turkey has never been a reliable friend for Iran, either, historically. During Trump’s 12-Day War with Iran last year, Turkey opened its air space to U.S. aircraft to attack Iran from Azerbaijan, which also happens to be one of Israel’s key operational bases against Iran.
Taking advantage of the Ukraine conflict, Western intelligence and NATO have made big inroads into the Caucasus and Caspian regions bordering Russia’s Muslim republics and are challenging Iran’s security when it already faces an existential threat from the U.S.-Israeli alliance.
The Caspian Sea makes a strategically vital supply route between Russia and Iran. Bandar Anzali is for Tehran what Odessa Port is for Kyiv where it receives Western arms supplies. Indeed, Iran and Russia have a close military relationship.
Therefore, Ukraine’s attack on an Iranian commercial vessel in the Caspian Sea in Russia’s territorial waters on Saturday, the first such attack since the start of the Russia-Ukraine war, is anything but a stray incident. Kyiv claimed responsibility for striking an Iranian vessel, signalling that one of Eurasia’s most stable security zones is now vulnerable to the direct spillover of the Ukraine conflict.
The Kremlin took note and spokesman Dmitry Peskov remarked at his daily briefing on Tuesday that the “geography of the Kiev regime’s terrorist activities is expanding.” Citing the incident, he added cryptically that all this “again highlights the need for a successful and complete special military operation.”
The attack on the Iranian ship was carried out from a distance of approximately 1,200 kilometres. Moscow has repeatedly alleged that such precise targeting over very long distances is way beyond Ukraine’s military capability and is only possible with the West’s direct participation.
Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov touched on it again on July 24:
“A significant portion of the support provided to Vladimir Zelensky (from the West) comes from the United States. This is not only because the Americans sell weapons to the EU, which then transfers them to Ukraine, but also because the United States provides intelligence and reconnaissance, Starlink remains operational, and advanced technologies that require specialist expertise on the battlefield do not find their way there by accident. That is the way things are.”
The New York Times’ report on the Ukrainian attack appeared under the headline “Ukraine’s Strike on an Iranian Ship Could Bring Two Wars Closer.”
The Wall Street Journal headline read: “Two Wars Converge in the Caspian Sea as Ukraine Hits Iranian Supply Line to Russia.”
Al Jazeera gave a further twist saying “Ukraine’s Zelenskyy set to meet Trump as Iran and Ukraine wars converge.”
A BBC report acknowledged that the incident” marked the first direct link between the wars in Iran and Ukraine.” Later in the article, it added, however, “But some experts question the wisdom of Kyiv’s decision to pick a fight with Iran.”
Transcaucasia’s ‘Trump Route’
The impact of the Iran conflict initially seemed negative for Ukraine. It threatened to divert Trump’s already wavering attention. However, there has been not only no let-up in U.S. support for Ukraine and in certain ways, the U.S. involvement has only intensified by escalating the covert operations in Russian territory. Admittedly, these tactical advantages may not add up ultimately, as Moscow is also stepping up attacks all across the frontline in Ukraine with a view to end the war soon.
The Ukrainian attack on the Iranian ship could well be a calibrated move by Washington. Ukraine acted simultaneously with the U.S. bombing of Gilan province, suggesting a degree of coordination.
The Iranian ambassador to Russia disclosed that the ship was hardly five kilometers from the mouth of River Volga when the attack took place.
If the Moscow-led regional concord on the Caspian’s collective security is weakened, extra-regional military and security rivalries could vitiate the region impacting Russia and Iran’s core interests. Tehran views the Caspian Sea incident not as an isolated tactical event but as evidence of a broader shift in its surrounding security environment.
Last August, U.S.-Azerbaijan-Armenia tripartite agreement was signed in the White House that will create a major transit corridor in Transcaucasia to be named the Trump Route for International Peace and Prosperity. Plainly put, the U.S. and NATO are seriously contesting Russia’s pre-eminence in the Caspian / Central Asian regions.
Evidently, the Caspian Sea is no longer the conflict-free zone it was once believed to be. A new arena of geopolitical competition, fundamentally reshaping the security landscape of Eurasia and potentially marking the emergence of a new geographic theatre of conflict, has surfaced last weekend.
M.K. Bhadrakumar is a former diplomat. He was India’s ambassador to Uzbekistan and Turkey. Views are personal.
https://www.indianpunchline.com/us-conjoins-the-wars-in-eurasia-west-asia/
READ FROM TOP.
PLEASE VISIT:
YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT — SINCE 2005.
Gus Leonisky
POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.
RABID ATHEIST.
WELCOME TO THIS INSANE WORLD….