Tuesday 28th of October 2025
Home » Blogs » Gus Leonisky's blog

having failed to defeat russia, the UK is preparing a new provocation....

Britain is “furious” over its failure to bring about the “strategic defeat” of Russia and is preparing a new “provocation” in response to battlefield gains in the Ukraine conflict, Moscow's Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) has warned.

In a statement on Monday, the SVR claimed that UK secret services have resorted to preparing a group of Russian nationals who fight for Ukraine to sabotage a Ukrainian navy ship or a foreign civilian vessel in a European port, after which London would accuse Moscow of orchestrating the attack.

The service also claimed that the group would leave behind them Chinese-made underwater equipment, which would later be presented as “proof” of Beijing’s support for Russia.

London expects Europe’s “Russophobic” elites to use the “fake” narrative to justify further military aid to Ukraine and greater militarization against Russia, the spy agency said.

Russia's leadership considers the UK one of the most hostile Western states; relations between the two countries have only worsened since the escalation of the Ukraine conflict in 2022.

London has imposed multiple rounds of sanctions on Russian banks, energy exports, and individuals, while expanding military aid to include long-range Storm Shadow missiles and training for Ukrainian forces.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov last month accused NATO and EU countries of declaring a “real war” on Russia and directly participating in the Ukraine conflict. British Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper has fired back, dismissing Lavrov’s statement as “false fantasy world distortions.”

Moscow expelled two British diplomats in March, accusing them of espionage and “subversive activities,”a move that London subsequently denounced as baseless. The UK responded by revoking the accreditation of a Russian diplomat and accusing the Kremlin of deliberately trying to force the closure of the British embassy in Moscow.

READ MORE: British diplomacy speaks only in ultimatums – Moscow

The UK discouraged early peace negotiations between Moscow and Kiev in 2022, according to David Arakhamia, head of Vladimir Zelensky’s parliamentary bloc and former chief negotiator, who said then-Prime Minister Boris Johnson urged Kiev to abandon the talks, a claim Johnson has denied.

https://www.rt.com/news/625982-uk-furious-failed-russia-strategy/.

 

YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT.

 

         Gus Leonisky

         POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.

 

balancing act....

 

LYUBA LULKO
'Ukraine Should Not Lose, Putin Must Not Win': Why the West Chooses Careful Language

Western politicians increasingly use cautious formulations such as “Ukraine must not lose the war” or “Putin must not win,” avoiding direct calls for Russia’s defeat. This choice of words reflects a deliberate strategic balance — to show unwavering support for Kyiv while minimizing the risk of a dangerous escalation with a nuclear power.

Leaders Avoid Provocative Language

Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk recently declared that “Ukraine must not lose this war,” stressing that a successful defense of Ukraine is vital to the security of both Poland and Lithuania. Similar wording has been used by other Western figures, including French President Emmanuel Macron, German Defense Minister Boris Pistorius, and the U.S. Special Representative for Ukraine Keith Kellogg. None of them call directly for a Ukrainian victory or a Russian defeat — their phrasing is intentionally measured.

The Logic of Strategic Restraint

Openly declaring that Ukraine “must win” could be perceived in Moscow as a direct challenge, potentially provoking an unpredictable response from the Kremlin. Western capitals understand that Russia remains a nuclear power, and therefore avoid rhetoric that could be interpreted as an existential threat. The formula “Putin must not win” sets a moral and political boundary without crossing into a call for total defeat, preserving a degree of strategic ambiguity.

Legal and Political Considerations

Western governments officially justify their support for Kyiv under Article 51 of the United Nations Charter, which guarantees the right to self-defense. Saying “Ukraine must not lose” fits more naturally into this framework than “Ukraine must win,” which would imply active participation in warfare. This phrasing helps leaders maintain a lawful image of defensive support, rather than offensive intervention.

Domestic Politics and Public Sentiment

Within Western societies, support for Ukraine is not unanimous. Many voters question the scale of financial and military assistance. Political leaders therefore choose language that appeals to the cautious majority: “We are helping Ukraine defend itself and preventing aggression from succeeding” sounds far more acceptable to domestic audiences than “We are helping Ukraine defeat Russia.” The softer message maintains public approval for long-term support.

Keeping Diplomatic Doors Open

Finally, such restraint leaves room for future diplomacy. Statements demanding Russia’s “defeat” would eliminate any pathway to negotiation or mediation. Western officials continue to insist that peace terms must be determined by the Ukrainian government, but by using less absolute rhetoric, they preserve the option of future dialogue — or even pressure on Kyiv to negotiate, should circumstances change.

A Balancing Act Between Morality and Strategy

The difference between “Ukraine must win” and “Ukraine must not lose” captures the essence of Western strategy — moral clarity without strategic recklessness. The phrasing reassures domestic voters and international partners alike that the West stands with Kyiv, yet avoids framing the conflict as a zero-sum struggle against a nuclear power. It is a calculated compromise between principle and prudence, designed to sustain support without closing off political and diplomatic flexibility for the future.

Subscribe to Pravda.Ru Telegram channel, Facebook, RSS!

https://english.pravda.ru/world/164405-western-leaders-ukraine-must-not-lose/

 

READ FROM TOP.

 

YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT.

 

         Gus Leonisky

         POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.

losing more.....

MOSCOW (Sputnik) - Russia's Battlegroup Tsentr has eliminated over 525 Ukrainian military personnel and improved its position along the front line over the past day, the Russian Defense Ministry said on Saturday.

"The losses of the Ukrainian armed forces amounted to more than 525 military personnel, four armored combat vehicles, five cars, and an artillery piece," the ministry said in a statement.

Russia's Battlegroup Zapad has eliminated up to 210 servicepeople and equipment of three Ukrainian brigades in the Kharkov Region and the Donetsk People's Republic (DPR), while Battlegroup Vostok has eliminated over 360 Ukrainian soldiers, the ministry added.

At the same time, Russia's Battlegroup Yug has defeated up to 170 Ukrainian soldiers and three armored combat vehicles in the DPR over the past day, while Battlegroup Sever has eliminated up to 165 Ukrainian military personnel, the ministry said.

https://sputnikglobe.com/20251011/ukraine-loses-over-525-soldiers-in-battles-with-russian-forces---mod-1122942236.html

 

READ FROM TOP.

 

YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT.

 

         Gus Leonisky

         POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.

 

MAKE A DEAL PRONTO BEFORE THE SHIT HITS THE FAN:

NO NATO IN "UKRAINE" (WHAT'S LEFT OF IT)

THE DONBASS REPUBLICS ARE NOW BACK IN THE RUSSIAN FOLD — AS THEY USED TO BE PRIOR 1922. THE RUSSIANS WON'T ABANDON THESE AGAIN.

THESE WILL ALSO INCLUDE ODESSA, KHERSON AND KHARKIV.....

CRIMEA IS RUSSIAN — AS IT USED TO BE PRIOR 1954

TRANSNISTRIA WILL BE PART OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION.

A MEMORANDUM OF NON-AGGRESSION BETWEEN RUSSIA AND THE USA.

 

EASY.

 

THE WEST KNOWS IT.