There is a lot of opinions about “Russia invading Poland with drones”…

Some commentators are suggesting that the Russians are "invading Poland with drones" deliberately so to distract the NATO forces from what is happening at the “front” (where there are "no NATO troops"), while forcing the military in NATO territories to scramble… Trump has called it a “mistake” as if the event was accidentally done by the RUSSIANS… while he hopes the conflict will stop soon under his command... Fat luck....

From a Russian perspective, there is nothing to gain for Russia having its drones cross the Polish border. All this does is bring brickbats from most decent people around the world onto Russia…

So, who benefits? The Nazi government in Kiev is the main immediate beneficiary…. We know… False flag? 90 per cent...

ONE THING IS CERTAIN: the downed drones in POLAND are not GERAN drones, as stated in some Western reports.

So, what types of drones? THE DRONES THAT CROSSED INTO POLAND ARE NOT RUSSIAN. This is 99.9 per cent verified (but we could be wrong, as these “could be new secret weapons” — considering they do not appear in the Russian drone catalogue). 

The Russians are coy about this, because they want Poland to give them the details, such as serial numbers, identification, etc, which the Poles aren’t going to give, because this could expose that THEY WERE UKRAINIAN or English drones, used by the Kiev regime.

Meanwhile the Russians can wear the flak like water off a duck’s back.

The Russians are patient. They do not have to fret about NATO sabre-rattling, but in some way whoever did it — say unintelligent Zelenskakaki in order to get more money and more weapons — gave the Russians a good view of NATO reactive defences in Poland, which would have used EXPENSIVE missiles and burned a lot of jet fuel to down what appears to be VERY cheap (REALLY badly made) drones THAT COULD NOT TRAVEL MORE THAN 50 kms WITHOUT FALLING APART...

There has been REAL photographs (not AI nor retouched) which we’re NOT going to post here) showing SOME (non-Russian?) identification, but the posting character is somewhat cagey and his link has been “vanished”. 

So who killed Charlie Kirk? probably a professional hitman paid for by the KIEV REGIME… This is high speculation, but looking at the evidence, MANY X posts and past history of Charlie, at this stage this is about 85 per cent certain.

It is probable that should the HITMAN be caught, he would be shot dead ON THE SPOT and he knows it. No court case, no hanging, no fuss... A small reward has been posted by the FBI. It is highly probable that this culprit will never be found.

Either way, the right wing is lauding CHARLIE as a “martyr”, while the left is loathing him more dead than alive… He was not a savoury character, but was entitled to "Freedom of speech".... 

Below is a “fait-divers” about Nikki Haley….  

Inscribing messages on and/or of signing ammunition is one of the more macabre acts of post-9/11 America. How many politicians have signed US-made, Israeli-launched bombs that have killed Palestinian children? Nikki Haley signed her Israeli bomb: “Finish them.”

Nikki is a mad cow...

GUS LEONISKY

YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT.

         Gus Leonisky

         POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.