Tuesday 30th of June 2026

the MoU gives the US nothing it wanted with iran.....

With the details of the signed Memorandum of Understanding still unclear, it does appear, for all intents and purposes, that the United States has lost the war with Iran. That means Pete Hegseth, the first Secretary of War, has lost a war.

As if the US couldn’t look more foolish, the MoU gives the US nothing it wanted when it comes to the military objectives it was pursuing in Iran.

 

The First Secretary of War Loses A War

MAC SLAVOSH 

 

The only big “accomplishment” is that Iran will reopen the Strait of Hormuz, but not “toll-free” as US President Donald Trump claimed. But the vital waterway was open before the US and Israel’s joint strikes on Iran on February 28th that started the war.

The Center for Economic Policy and Research wrote that Trump and Hegseth took the US into a war that it was unable to win, and the fact that the ruling class didn’t see it was astounding. Thousands of people have died in Iran, and many more were killed in Lebanon, where the war is continuing. Not only that, the war pushed the cost of fuel to unbearable heights as Americans are already grappling with inflation that has pushed grocery prices higher than ever.

The cost of this war to the US was a whopping $25 billion and resulted in significant U.S. munitions depletion. So that the Strait of Hormuz could be reopened, which, again, was already open before the war. So what did the US gain? It looks like nothing.

Iran has already declared victory, with most on both sides agreeing that the US is on the losing side.

Iran Declares Memorandum of Understanding A “Record of US Failure”

Because of his own failures, Hegseth berated North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) allies for failing to provide US military forces access to bases on the continent to launch attacks on Iran. Hegseth called the action of NATO countries “shameful.”

“These allies, they put America’s sons and daughters, our sons and daughters, at risk by denying them the predictable access, basing and overflight that never should have been in question at all,” Hegseth, the infamous Christian Nationalist and misogynist, said.

https://www.activistpost.com/the-first-secretary-of-war-loses-a-war/

 

==================

 

Timothy Snyder

Dressing up defeat as victory

 

The US ‘deal’ with Iran is a humiliation. This outcome reveals not just Trump’s incompetence but flaws in the system that allowed him to rise to power.

In promoting his ‘deal’ with Iran, US President Donald Trump has tried to dress up a humiliating defeat as a victory. While it’s tempting to blame this outcome on incompetent leadership, it stems more from the policies and institutions that have allowed entertainers and profiteers to rise to power.

America has capitulated to Iran. The ‘memorandum of understanding’ signed by the two sides specifies terms that spell victory for the Islamic Republic and humiliation for President Donald Trump and the United States. War, as some people apparently needed to learn, is not about the pleasure one takes in watching things blow up. It is politics by other means. And as Iran has just demonstrated, winning means changing the enemy’s politics so that they are forced to surrender.

From the beginning, the unprovoked US-Israeli war on Iran put Trump’s incompetence on display for all to see. Instead of trying to understand how the Iranian leadership thinks and operates, Trump, US Secretary of ‘War’, Pete Hegseth, and other US officials treated them as stooges who would immediately submit as soon as the bombs started falling.

With no strategy of its own, it did not occur to the Trump administration that Iran would have a plan: retaliate with long-range strikes and close the Strait of Hormuz. US officials had no second move, except to dress up defeat as victory (which they are, laughably, still trying to do). This is what happens when voters entrust entertainers to wage war, and profiteers to negotiate peace.

Many Americans still seem to be under the illusion that Trump is a shrewd dealmaker. He never was – that was a character he played on television. Trump and his cabinet members talk big in front of the cameras but know nothing about how global power works. Trump is vulnerable to flattery, always in a hurry, unable to focus and indifferent to any issue beyond his own comfort. After starting the war against Iran on a lark, he surrendered for political convenience: lower gas prices would bolster his bid to stay in the White House forever.

Until now, I figured that Trump’s geopolitical legacy would be as a footnote in the Ukraine war: a wannabe oligarch who artificially extended a real oligarch’s war of aggression. Now, Trump will also be remembered as the architect of the brutal Iranian regime’s revival.

By attacking Iran, Trump generated sympathy within the country for torturers and murderers. By losing to Iran, he expanded its power in the Middle East. And by capitulating to Iran, he created an enduring revenue stream for its rulers. Iran will charge fees for transit through the Strait of Hormuz; the US will unfreeze $24 billion in Iranian assets and pay $300 billion in reconstruction funds. Gone is any leverage that America had to prevent Iran from building a nuclear weapon.

We tend to think of evil and folly as mutually exclusive. If something is evil, it must serve an intelligent purpose; if it is foolish, it must not be very malicious. But Trump’s war in Iran shows that evil and folly can march hand in hand along the path to national self-destruction.

Trump’s war on Iran was both a strategic and an ethical disaster. Fighting an undeclared and illegal war of aggression, flouting the laws of war and killing scores of civilians do not bring victory. Delighting in such actions is not a sign of canny calculation. It is simply wrong. One can enjoy violence and still be a loser. One can be both hard-hearted and soft-headed, as Trump and Hegseth have proven.

In other words, there is no consolation. The Trump administration used evil means foolishly, not for some good purpose, and left the world far worse off than it was before. Thanks to Trump, the US has caused widespread economic pain and – to the delight of China, Russia and Iran – created a more disorderly international order, less bound by law.

But if evil and folly can march together, so, too, can virtue and wisdom. The US reached this point because it allowed political, economic and media power to be concentrated in the hands of a few. While it’s tempting to blame America’s capitulation on incompetent leadership, it stems more from the policies and institutions that allow such people to rise to power.

Wars of whimsy are a symptom of tyranny, and a warning for those who prefer republics. They must be opposed; but, more fundamentally, they must be prevented by removing money from politics, addressing basic inequalities, breaking up monopolies, and enabling social mobility.

Iran easily won this war because it had only to threaten the self-interest of an aspiring tyrant. To build an America that does not capitulate requires the opposite of Trump’s hard-heartedness and soft-headedness. Americans should value leaders with harder heads – people who have demonstrated genuine qualifications and done some good with their lives – and resist charismatic charlatans who stick their hands in our pockets and send our children to war. We must also value leaders with softer hearts: leaders who channel our desire to care for one another and to create a government that enables better lives for us all.

Project Syndicate 2026

https://johnmenadue.com/post/2026/06/dressing-up-defeat-as-victory/

 

 

===================

 

PLEASE VISIT:

YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT — SINCE 2005.

         Gus Leonisky

         POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.

         RABID ATHEIST.

         WELCOME TO THIS INSANE WORLD….

shukriya....

“Shukriya, Pakistan”: Donald Trump and the de-escalation of Iran with four huge obstacles

by Alfredo Jalife-Rahme

President Donald Trump eventually came to realize that he had been mistaken about Iran and wrong to attack that civilization-state. He signed the Islamabad Memorandum—initially electronically. He acknowledged $300 billion in war damages, while masking them within an investment fund. From now on, the sole obstacle to peace is not Israel, but Benjamin Netanyahu.

"Shukrya, Pakistan" ("Thank you, Pakistan"): this is the cry of the vast majority of the planet—with the predictable exception of Israel during the Netanyahu era—appreciating Islamabad’s remarkable mediation. “Shukrya” comes from Arabic, rather than Persian, and means "thank you." Islamabad’s famous 14-point memorandum [1] was unveiled by the Iranian state agency Mehr—a name that, within the world of Iranian subtleties and symbols—a "civilization of the countryside" dating back 5,000 years—signifies "friendship" and derives from the pre-Zoroastrian Aryan deity of light, Mithras.

Three days before the official signing in Geneva—under the auspices of Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif—prices for various grades of crude oil fell, particularly "Murban" (Oman/UAE) crude, which has already dropped back to $72 per barrel. In my Geopolitical Radar video, I elaborated on each of the 14 points of the Islamabad Memorandum [2]. Four mega-traps are already looming:

1. Netanyahu clings to his limitless “security zones” as part of his so-called eschatological project of “Greater Israel”—a concept that never actually existed [3].

2. Withdrawal from Lebanon: Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi links the agreement to an Israeli withdrawal from Lebanon [4]—something Netanyahu [5] and his combative Defense Minister Katz (sic) flatly refuse: "Israel will not withdraw from the lands captured in Lebanon." This poses a challenge in the context of the interim agreement between Iran and the United States [6].
Trump’s most recent stance—articulated following his meeting with France’s Emmanuel Macron at the anachronistic G7 summit in Evian—echoes a scenario of balkanization for Lebanon along the lines of its three main communities: Shiites (protected by Iran), Sunnis (protected by Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Turkey, and Egypt), and Christians (protected by France). He stated: "Al-Charaa [i.e., Syrian President Al-Joulani] was very amiable with me. He agreed to everything I asked of him. If Israel cannot get the job done without killing everyone, he will do it. Syria will do it [7]." Does the emergence of the jihadist beheader—and now Syrian president—Al-Charaa signal the balkanization of Lebanon into three parts?

3. The US Congress, still controlled by the all-powerful Israeli lobby AIPAC, must approve the lifting of sanctions against Iran—a herculean task.

4. $300 billion in war reparations for Iran: leaks in The Jerusalem Post reveal that "the Trump administration is considering a $300 billion investment fund in the event that Iran maintains the ceasefire [8]." Such a fund "would be created to attract investment in Iran’s abundant energy resources."

In a fascinating interview of metahistorical scope, commentator Tucker Carlson and University of Chicago scholar John Mearsheimer highlight the grave problem facing Trump if he fails to rein in Netanyahu, given that the United States stands on the brink of an "economic precipice" unless it rejects the disruptive, eschatological Netanyahu [9].

Israel Hayom reports that Trump is considering dismissing several administration officials who oppose his Iran deal—among them the incompetent Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, and CIA Director John Ratcliffe.

After the electronic signing of the Islamabad memorandum (in addition to Qatar’s mediation) three days ago, between Trump/JD Vance and the Ghalibaf/Araghchi binomial, there are still three days before the face-to-face signing in Geneva, but Netanyahu and Katz will do everything to sabotage it: from the moment the extremely difficult 60 days of closed negotiations should begin.

The humanist, peerless poet, and Renaissance philosopher Dante Alighieri (1265–1321) declared in his Divine Comedy that "the road to hell is paved with good intentions"; the four major obstacles outlined above—in addition to the Islamabad Memorandum—could lead to another, rather sinister Divine Comedy.

 

Alfredo Jalife-Rahme
Source
La Jornada (Mexico)
The largest Spanish-language daily newspaper in the world.

https://www.voltairenet.org/article224788.html

 

READ FROM TOP.

PLEASE VISIT:

YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT — SINCE 2005.

         Gus Leonisky

         POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.

         RABID ATHEIST.

         WELCOME TO THIS INSANE WORLD….