Thursday 13th of November 2025

consistent with the historical trajectory of american foreign policy...

At the end of World War II in 1945, international relations quickly coalesced around two superpowers (the USA and the USSR), giving rise to a bipolar world. Since then, the quest for a balance of power, fueled by the space race and the expansion of spheres of influence, has fostered a logic of escalation and a mutual perception of threat that continues to divide relations between Washington and Moscow today.

 

Trump is fighting neither for peace, nor for Ukraine, much less for Russia, but for the survival of the United States

Mohamed Lamine KABA

 Created in a time of relative peace in 1949, NATO has thus established itself as the military instrument of American foreign policy (since the Cold War of 1947-1991 and is part of a historical continuity of war waged by allies or by proxy), at the heart of which lies the containment of Russia, then China, as well as the emerging and middle powers of the Middle East, Africa, and Latin America.The Ukrainian conflict, which Donald Trump calls a “Biden war,” has its roots in the 2014 Maidan coup, the starting point of a proxy war against Russia—an episode the Obama administration witnessed firsthand. In reality, Trump’s first presidency merely continued this pattern: preparing, under the guise of rhetoric, what is now known as the “Biden war.”Trump’s posturing (trips and other diplomatic gestures) is therefore consistent with the historical trajectory of American foreign policy: containing Russia to better control Eurasia.

It is therefore not surprising that the evolution of the Ukrainian conflict is now at the heart of a systemic reconfiguration of global power relations. Since 2022, this conflict has transcended its purely territorial dimension to reveal the structural fractures in the international order established after 1945, the unbridled bipolarity.

It crystallizes the exhaustion of the American unipolar model in the face of the rise of a multipolarity structured around Russia, China, and the Global South, operating within the BRICS Alliance and many other alliances of a similar nature, founded on economic polycentrism and emerging multipolarity. Through its economic, energy, and security ramifications, the Ukrainian issue acts as a major geopolitical catalyst, redefining alliances, reassessing sovereignties, and disrupting the geostrategic architecture of the contemporary world system.

Trump’s false messianism: peace as an alibi for imperial decline

From Ukraine to Gaza, from the Democratic Republic of Congo to Venezuela, from Sudan to Cuba, and from Iran to Afghanistan, Donald Trump is not a peacemaker. He is the symptom of an empire watching itself wither away in the world’s mirror and can no longer bear its own reflection. When Trump proclaims that he will “end the war in Ukraine in 24 hours,” he is not preaching peace; he is preaching the survival of a fractured, disjointed America, caught in the vertigo of its own decline. Behind the simplistic rhetoric of the “dealmaker” lies the panic of a nation that senses the center of the world inexorably shifting away from Washington toward Moscow, Beijing, and the expanded BRICS.

Behind the apparent differences between Trump and Biden, the same imperial logic persists, a logic of self-preservation 

What Trump is staging is the desperate attempt of an empire to save its skin by changing its mask. Under his rule, as under Biden’s, American foreign policy has always been based on the fear of losing its monopoly on power. Ukraine is merely a puppet show where two historical temporalities clash, not two worldviews: that of a weary West clinging to its hegemony by proxy and that of a resurgent Eurasia, led by Russia, which is restoring the world’s capacity for choice.

Trump, by claiming to want to end the war, has no other objective than to redefine the terms of American leadership, no longer through the ideology of human rights, but through the transactional arrogance of profit. But peace, in his language, is merely a tool: he doesn’t want the end of the war; he wants the economic victory of the United States in a world where its military dominance is no longer an illusion. Behind the apparent differences between Trump and Biden, the same imperial logic persists, a logic of self-preservation.

But the world is no longer the world of 1991. Western sanctions failed to break Russia; they transformed it. Moscow has become the driving force behind global resistance, a magnet for nations weary of American unilateralism. Putin’s Russia, ostracized by the West, has paradoxically found its legitimacy in this marginalization: it embodies the triumph of reality over propaganda. While Washington grapples with its internal contradictions, the Kremlin is redrawing the paths of power toward the Global South.

Russia, a mirror of American disorder: when multipolarity buries the imperial illusion

What American elites fear most is not a Russian victory in Ukraine; it is Russia’s normalization within the global system without Washington’s approval. For if Moscow can resist, trade, innovate, and assert itself despite the Western embargo, then America loses its primary tool of domination: fear. Since 2022, every missile fired at the Donbas front has sounded like a death knell for the illusion of American omnipotence.

Trump, in reality, is merely a secondary player in this major shift. His electoral and post-electoral posturing is simply a theater of crisis where he attempts to transform America’s strategic defeat into an opportunity for domestic reconquest. By denouncing military spending in Ukraine, he is not seeking peace; he is seeking to deflect the anger of an American people who no longer believe in the Empire. He wants to save the United States from internal collapse, not through morality, but through withdrawal—a strategic isolation that would signal the end of American globalism.

But this retreat, paradoxically, is accelerating the multipolarization of the world, especially since economic polycentrism is asserting itself at the same time as emerging multipolarity. Every time Washington retreats, Moscow advances; every time NATO stirs, the rest of the world emancipates itself. The BRICS+, by expanding to include Saudi Arabia, Iran, and Ethiopia, are drawing the map of the 21st century: that of a world without a single center, where America becomes one actor among many. And in this new concert of nations, Russia no longer appears as the “devil” of the West, but as the architect of an alternative order, founded on sovereignty and the rejection of Western tutelage.

The most ironic thing is that Trump, despite himself and his MAGA (Make America Great Again) agenda, is contributing to this demise of the American order, as if the theories (Brzeziński, Kissinger, Fukuyama, and Huntington) on the strategic direction of Washington’s foreign policy now serve only to lead America to the precipice. By undermining the credibility of alliances, mocking NATO, and fracturing the Western consensus to materialize his MAGA, he is, in one way or another, unintentionally paving the way for the deconstruction of the imperial myth. Behind his excesses, he is unwittingly accomplishing what Russia desires: the disintegration of the Western front, undermined by cynicism and moral exhaustion. This is eloquent proof that the crisis of intelligence and leadership is taking hold of the American government apparatus, the deep state is at work, and Nigeria is in the crosshairs of Trumpism.

It is therefore obvious that the man who claims to want to save the United States is working to expose its fragility. Empire never dies from a lost battle, but from a shattered illusion. And today, the great American illusion is the continued belief that the world needs its salvation. Trump is fighting neither for peace, nor for Ukraine, nor for Russia; he is fighting to delay the end of an already outdated hegemony. But he has already lost that battle: the world has ceased to believe in the United States, and that is perhaps the greatest victory of contemporary Russia.

https://journal-neo.su/2025/11/12/trump-is-fighting-neither-for-peace-nor-for-ukraine-much-less-for-russia-but-for-the-survival-of-the-united-states/

 

YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT — SINCE 2005.

 

         Gus Leonisky

         POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.

boomerang....

 

 BY LYUBA LULKO     USA opts for Marshall Plan 2.0 to coerce Zelensky to peace talks     USA achieves many of its goals in proxy war with Russia  

The United States has achieved many goals in the proxy war with the Russian Federation. Further escalation of the crisis in Ukraine is not beneficial for the Americans, as they may have to backpedal.

 United States does not win the war against Russia

At the current stage of the proxy war of the world powers, Russia has managed to cause the economic sanctions to boomerang on the West in the form of energy, food and fuel crises. In military terms, after Afghanistan, the United States switched to a different method of warfare in Ukraine — war by proxy.

In the context of such a war, the suffering of the Ukrainian people becomes conceptually irrelevant to the United States. There is a question of the ability of the Kyiv regime to ensure a military victory for the United States.

The statements that we could hear from Jens Stoltenberg suggest that they think about it at NATO.

Speaking at a press conference in Bucharest at the summit of the alliance, Stoltenberg said that NATO's prime goal at the moment was to ensure Ukraine's victory rather than discuss its NATO membership. Ukraine will not be able to join anything otherwise, the NATO Secretary General said.

"The main focus now is on supporting Ukraine, ensuring that President Putin doesn't win but that Ukraine prevails as a sovereign independent nation in Europe. And that's the main focus of our Alliance and that's also the main focus of our partnership," Stoltenberg said.

The next stage is nuclear war

Western media say that Ukraine has all chances to achieve success in the operation. Some publications already write about its post-war reconstruction, about the trial of "war criminals", reparations, etc. They make it all look as if Russia has already lost the conflict.

However, this cannot be done without unleashing a nuclear catastrophe. Russia will strike a nuclear blow if there is a threat to its territorial integrity. Nuclear escalation may follow if the West stops Russia from retrieving control over Kherson, Zaporozhye regions and the DPR.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov warned that nuclear powers should not fight even in a conventional war. This opinion, of course, was conveyed to first persons in the United States.

The West thus opts to continue the path of arms supplies to Kyiv. However, according to a realistic military assessment, even if Western powers invest billions and billions of dollars in Ukraine, the Ukrainian troops will lose the fight to the Russian Armed Forces simply because of Russia's advantages in terms of defence technology and manpower.

Washington achieves many goals in the war with Russia

Will the US enter into a hot war with Russia if Zelensky's Ukraine is in danger? The answer to this question is negative. The United States will not risk being drawn into a nuclear war. The Americans supposedly push Ukraine towards peace talks on recognizing the status quo (that is, Russia's territorial annexations).

Indeed, Washington has already achieved many goals:

  • Nord Streams 1 and 2 have been destroyed;
  • Germany is no longer Russia's partner;
  • Russia has lost a significant part of its oil and gas revenues and will not soon make up for them in the East, which weakens the Russian economy;
  • The EU is no longer a competitor to the US — it is has become forever addicted to US expensive oil, gas and military equipment. The US has ensured dominance over Europe for many years to come.

Interestingly, the EU has pulled out from all space exploration contracts with the Russian Federation, terminated almost all business ties in industry, whereas the Americans continue their cooperation on the International Space Station project, meteorological data exchange, etc. They do not hurry to impose an embargo on uranium, titanium, and so on and so forth.

This suggests that the United States is well aware of the fact that such a resource-rich nuclear power as the Russian Federation can not disappear from the world map, unlike Ukraine.

Scenario continues: Marshall Plan 2.0

Until Russia annexes more territories, Washington is confident that it is time to stop, take profits from the war and continue to profit from contracts to restore what remains of Ukraine. Marshall Plan 2.0 will take the Western economy out of recession.

A continued escalation in Ukraine is bringing chaos to Europe — millions of refugees, thousands of mercenaries with weapons, an unstable border. EU states such as Hungary oppose initiatives to support Ukraine endlessly, as long as it takes. In the Czech Republic, a rebellion against the authorities has practically matured on this basis.

Sooner or later, the EU will wonder whether the United States is going to put New York and Washington at risk to save Poland and Lithuania. Does the EU want to have such a destabilising factor as Bandera's Ukraine at its doorstep? Do European taxpayers need to get accustomed to cold homes and growing inflation?

Moscow needs to obtain international recognition of new territories

Many in the world hold the United States accountable for the outbreak of the special operation in Ukraine — the Americans disregarded Russia's interests. Washington has lost the loyalty of "autocratic regimes" in China, Turkey, as well as of many "democratic" regimes, such as India and Brazil.

The whole world wants this war to end as soon as possible, because it causes an unprecedented energy and food crises, let alone inflation that affects literally everyone.

Subscribe to Pravda.Ru Telegram channelFacebookRSS!

https://english.pravda.ru/world/155002-usa_proxy_war_russia/

 

READ FROM TOP.

 

YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT — SINCE 2005.

 

         Gus Leonisky

         POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.