Wednesday 17th of September 2025

proud like a weed in a field of noodles....

Kaja Kallas, the European Union’s de facto foreign minister (and former prime minister of Estonia), is unusually, grotesquely incompetent, even for an unelected EU apparatchik.

Like former German Foreign Minister Annalena “360 Degrees” Baerbock – now instagraming like an excited upper-class teenager from her ill-begotten UN sinecure in New York – Kallas also displays an enormous capacity for being pleased with herself. She appears never happier than when holding a mic to her own platitudes, presented in a mortifyingly basic form of very labored English, while being obsequiously soft-balled by a fawning interviewer.

 

Kaja Kallas personifies the void inside the EU’s decline
The top EU diplomat’s “surprise” at the role of the Soviets and the Chinese in WWII reveals the ugly incompetence of Western elites

BY Tarik Cyril Amar

 

In both cases, the contrast between the self-image and reality is jarring: Kallas and Baerbock’s obvious, glaring lack of intellectual ability, elementary education, and basic professional know-how should have ended their misguided career ambitions long ago.

Yet, instead, Kallas, like Baerbock, has not only rapidly fallen up the slippery ladder of career and privilege. She has done so in a particularly visible area. High officials responsible for the economy, for instance, can do – and do – enormous damage. But those in charge of foreign policy are no less dangerous, while, literally, publicly representing tens or hundreds of millions of people.

A professional and intelligent foreign minister – such as, for instance, China’s Wang Yi, India’s S. Jaishankar, or Russia’s Sergey Lavrov – can enhance respect for a country or bloc even among its critics or opponents. However, an amateurish and dim top diplomat becomes a disgrace to be ashamed of before the world, even among embarrassed friends. They’re perhaps worse: a laughingstock, signaling that whoever chooses to be represented by a fool must be foolish as well.

With Kaja Kallas’s tenure as the EU’s High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, both cringe and ridicule are abundant. Her recent peak performances have included a truly inane take on the history of the Second World War, silly and rather racist musings on the general abilities of “the Russians” and “the Chinese,” and, of course, a preposterous attempt to blame them – plus Iran and North Korea – for disrupting  our brave old world of a rules-bound order that includes the Gaza genocide, compliments of Israel and the West.

Regarding what Kallas mistakes for history, the high-flyer from Estonia has opined that she was surprised by claims that Russia and China fought together in and won World War II. Of course, that’s simply a fact: Both countries were and are widely recognized as prominent members of the alliance that defeated global fascism in Europe and Asia.

Indeed, if Kallas were capable of telling an intern to Google the matter or consult the online version of the Encyclopedia Britannica, she’d find out quickly that China and Russia (then the core of the Soviet Union) are counted among the “Big Four” core of the alliance (alongside Great Britain and the US). This place was earned with rivers of blood: China and the Soviet Union were the two most brutally devastated countries in World War Two. China fought massive Japanese forces, and Russia broke the spine of Nazi Germany’s Wehrmacht. Even busy Estonian collaborators could not save the day for the Führer.

Kallas, put differently, went public with her astonishment about water being wet and our planet a sphere.

In light of this historical (and, in a sad way, historic, too) imbecility it is intriguing to find that only last year Kallas spoke at the same Estonian conference as historian Tim Snyder. But then again, maybe it’s not, considering Snyder’s sorry descent into reliably Russophobic and compulsively Cold War re-enacting demagoguery. It also was the same meeting, of course, where Kallas glibly chattered away about breaking up Russia. Who knows? Maybe her friend Tim was nodding along encouragingly in the audience.

Regarding the various aptitudes of “the Russians” and “the Chinese” in “technology” and “social sciences,” it was hard to tell about what provincial stereotypes exactly Kallas was trying to ramble on. Except that, somehow, in her head they add up to a fiendish ability to make “big, big fires” in NATO-EU Europe. By which rather badaboom-ish expression, she clearly means that the big bad Russians and Chinese incite the otherwise famously happy and content masses of Europe. Yellow Vests, farmers’ rebellions, the new right surging in, at least, the UK, France, and Germany? Blame the outside agitators!

And then, there’s the global angle, obviously. A mind as capacious as Kallas’s must think big: There it turns out that it is not over three post-Cold War decades of arrogant and very violent Western unilateralism (served with or without “value” babble), regime change operations by war and subversion, economic warfare (by now also fratricidal), and, last but not least, outright genocide, as now in Gaza, that have discredited the West’s idea of international “order.” It is all the fault of those who dare resist this abomination masquerading as based on “rules,” namely, in this case, China, Iran, North Korea, and Russia.

Kallas is one of those public figures where it’s hard to believe they hear themselves talk, so deranged, out-of-place, and absurd is their output. But she clearly does, and she even loves it. The explanation for that is actually simple: We are obviously dealing with, in political terms, a ruthless opportunist and careerist; in intellectual terms, a bigoted ideologue; and, in psychological terms, a raging narcissist.

What is harder to answer is a much more important question: How is it possible that among almost 450 million EU citizens, it is Kaja Kallas who was selected to represent them all, atrociously, embarrassingly, shamefully? In a superficial, if still important, sense, such madness is the result of the EU not being the democratic “garden” its apparatchiks love to fantasize about but a regime of bureaucratic authoritarianism.

Citizens do not matter, self-empowered and self-selecting “elites” decide. Everything. In this case, what “qualifies” ditto Kallas is her fanatical Russophobia as well as provincial Sinophobia and the reliable simplicity and rigidity of her half-baked third-hand views.

In a deeper sense that is even more important, however, the rise and persistence of such a devastating, sadly comical incompetent speak to something else, of course: the profound, pervasive, social and cultural decadence of EU-NATO Europe. As long as Europeans – whether at the EU or national level – are represented by the likes of Kallas, Baerbock, or – for that matter – von der Leyen, Macron, Starmer, or Merz, they will not stop Europe’s rapid decline.

https://www.rt.com/news/624423-kaja-kallas-eu-decline/

 

YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT.

 

         Gus Leonisky

         POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.

ignoramus KK....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=66wK7U69Hfg

 

Why the US Can't Win a War Against China

For years war analysts have wondered about a potential US China War but in Beijing's recent military parade proves there is no chance the US can win a conventional war against China. As a result, the US is pulling out of Asia, away from China and in today's video we will break down why this massive shift in Asia is happening.

00:00 - Intro US China War
00:48 - Why the US is Pulling Away from China
01:54 - The Truth Behind China's Military Parade
02:41 - China's Efforts in World War 2
03:25 - Why the West Misunderstand History
05:48 - Why China Built a Large Military
07:02 - Why China Would Win the War
08:07 - China's New Military Equipment
09:27 - How China's Military is Inventing New Tech
11:05 - Why China's Navy is More Powerful
12:01 - USA's Shift to Other Countries
12:45 - USA New War in Venezuela
13:25 - US Deploying Troops to US Cities
14:00 - Conclusion

 

READ FROM TOP.

 

YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT.

 

         Gus Leonisky

         POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 195

empty kaka...

 

Kaja Kallas’ ignorance betrays the EU’s bleak future
The bloc’s top diplomat is oblivious to simple history – it should be a warning sign for member states

By Gao Jian

 

China and Russia on the victorious side of World War II? “That is something new.”

When EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas questioned whether China and Russia belonged to the victorious side of WWII during a conference organized by the EU Institute for Security Studies earlier this month, she revealed more than just personal historical ignorance. Her remark underscores a troubling detachment from fundamental historical truths that continue to shape today’s geopolitical landscape.

While interpretations of WWII may vary across ideological lines, it is widely accepted that the Allied victory was the result of a collective effort involving multiple nations. The Soviet Union, in particular, bore the unimaginable cost of 27 million lives in its struggle against Nazi Germany, effectively dismantling the Wehrmacht on the Eastern Front. Similarly, China’s resistance against Japanese militarism – lasting 14 years and costing over 35 million casualties – prevented Imperial Japan from expanding its aggression further into Asia and the Pacific. The tremendous sacrifices of both nations played a decisive role in the ultimate triumph of the worldwide anti-fascist war. To ignore these contributions is not merely an oversight; it is a deliberate erosion of historical memory.

Yet Kallas is not an outlier in this regard. She represents a broader, though often unspoken, tendency within parts of the European political and media elite to re-frame WWII as a victory primarily achieved by Western powers. This revisionist narrative not only distorts history but also undermines the moral and strategic credibility of the European Union. When those in high office casually dismiss the sacrifices of nations that were vital in defeating fascism, they weaken the EU’s diplomatic standing.

What makes Kallas’ comments particularly damaging is the current social context in the EU and the UK. They are currently navigating multiple overlapping crises: economic stagnation, energy insecurity, military instability in their eastern neighborhood, and a growing loss of confidence in their governance model. At such a critical juncture, the EU cannot afford foreign policy leadership that indulges in historical denialism or rhetorical provocations. Comments by Kallas diminish the EU’s stature and fuel perceptions that it is led by figures who prioritize ideological posturing over strategic thinking. In such a self-righteous manner by merely detaching from history and social realities, the EU’s politicians have over-consumed its accountability and jeopardize a still possible peace not just for Europe, but for global balance and security.

One has sufficient justification to suspect a deeper crisis within EU democratic institutions since Kallas is so bafflingly incompetent. Is the EU still a politically serious entity? If its foreign policy chief behaves so senselessly, what can we expect from the EU as a whole? Can it still secure its supranational ambition under such poor leadership? The requirement for consensus among member states often results in fragmented foreign policies and ambiguous messaging. Nowhere is this more evident than in the EU’s uneven response to the war in Ukraine, fraught with internal divisions over military aid, sanctions, and long-term strategy. Kallas’ remarks – though not representative of all EU members – highlight how individual officials can amplify these contradictions and undercut collective credibility.

If the EU wishes to be taken seriously as a geopolitical power, it must ensure that its representatives embody diplomatic rigor and historical awareness. Kallas is demonstrating the opposite, at the expense of the EU’s democratic resilience and political seriousness.

A very natural question would be: Is the EU sliding into being a potential liability for its member states’ interests? The bloc’s institutional design, often a product of political compromise, leads to confusion and inefficiency. When the High Representative for Foreign Affairs appears unaware of basic historical facts that underpin modern global relations, she not only erodes the EU’s ability to act as a reliable international actor but also dwarfs the international images of its member states.

Predictably, the anxiety of the EU’s future will loom larger as it fails to find its orientation in such a tremendously changing world. There is a growing fear that the Union is sliding into being a body hampered by bureaucratic inefficiency, ideological fragmentation, and a lack of strategic vision. Kallas’ absurd remarks are nothing more than empty talk, but they imply a wider governance crisis. For the EU to regain its credibility and influence, it must recommit to historical accuracy, foster diplomatic discipline, and reclaim a sense of strategic purpose. Otherwise, it is little more than a platform for uncoordinated and counterproductive rhetoric – a talking shop that weakens Europe from within rather than empowering it on the global stage.

https://www.rt.com/news/624680-kaja-kallas-ignorance-eu-future/