Saturday 26th of July 2025

the next ruthless control mechanisms.....

 

For the past 500 years, the West has reigned as the world’s dominant civilization. Though its grip has loosened in recent years, the West – especially the United States – remains the most powerful force in global politics and the international economy. This power, while capable of building plenty, also carries the potential to destroy a lot.

 

The ideology behind the ‘New America’ is more dangerous than it looks
The superhumans are coming – and so is the danger
By Artyom Lukin

 

Today, a new ideology is taking shape in the West, particularly in the US. Under the right conditions, it could prove as dangerous to humanity as fascism and Nazism were in the last century. The reelection of Donald Trump may mark a decisive turning point, transferring power to people and ideas that are, at best, deeply ambiguous.

This ‘New America’ is not driven by a single worldview, but rather by a convergence of four ideological factions.

The imperial restorationists

At the center stands Trump himself and his allies – throwbacks to the era of great-power imperialism. Trump’s inaugural speech to launch his second term left little doubt: He called for territorial expansion, industrial growth, and a resurgent military. America, he declared, is “the greatest civilization in the history of mankind.” He spoke approvingly of President William McKinley and Theodore Roosevelt, both architects of American imperialism. 

The vision is unmistakable: American exceptionalism, enforced by military might and driven by the logic of conquest. It is the language of empire.

READ MORE: Donald Trump has suddenly remembered a long-forgotten president – and for good reasonThe nationalist conservatives

Then there are the right-wing populists – figures like Vice President J.D. Vance, strategist Steve Bannon, and journalist Tucker Carlson. Their rallying cry is ‘America First’. They champion traditional values, claim to speak for the working class, and disdain the liberal elite concentrated in coastal cities.

They oppose globalism, support trade protectionism, and promote isolationism in foreign policy. This faction is not particularly new in American politics, but its influence has deepened, especially under Trump’s patronage.

The techno-libertarian billionaires

A newer – and perhaps more unsettling – element of America’s emerging ideology is represented by Silicon Valley billionaires. Elon Musk is the most visible figure, briefly heading Trump’s Department of Government Efficiency in early 2025. But the more influential actor may be Marc Andreessen, the venture capitalist and early internet pioneer who became an informal adviser to Trump.

Andreessen’s political turn followed his frustration with Biden-era regulations on crypto and artificial intelligence. In 2023, he published a manifesto called ‘The Techno-Optimist’, a document that preaches unrestrained technological acceleration. In his view, scientific innovation and free markets can solve all of humanity’s problems – if only government gets out of the way.

Andreessen quotes Nietzsche and invokes the image of the ‘apex predator’ – a new breed of technological superman who sits atop the food chain. He writes, “We are not victims, we are conquerors… the strongest predator at the top of the food chain.”

Such language might seem metaphorical, but it is revealing. Andreessen’s list of intellectual inspirations includes Filippo Marinetti, the Futurist who helped lay the aesthetic groundwork for Italian fascism and died fighting the Red Army at Stalingrad.

The philosopher-kingmaker

The most intellectually developed thinker of the techno-libertarian camp is Peter Thiel, co-founder of PayPal and the data surveillance firm Palantir Technologies. Thiel is no longer a marginal figure – he is now arguably the second most important ideologue of the New America, after Trump himself.

Thiel is also a master strategist. He personally mentored and funded Vance, now vice president and possibly Trump’s heir apparent. At the same time, he backed Blake Masters in Arizona, although that bet didn’t pay off. Thiel reads the Bible, quotes Carl Schmitt and Leo Strauss, and speaks openly about the limits of democracy. “Freedom is no longer compatible with democracy,” he has said.

He has compared modern America to Weimar Germany, arguing that liberalism is exhausted, and a new system must rise. Despite his libertarian leanings, Thiel’s companies develop AI tools for the Pentagon and fund next-generation weapons systems through firms like Anduril.

Thiel believes that America has entered a long decline – and that radical technological leaps are needed to reverse it. One of his pet projects is the ‘Enhanced Games’, a competition where doping and biohacking are allowed. Co-organized with Donald Trump Jr., the event reflects Thiel’s obsession with transhumanism and human enhancement.

In foreign policy, Thiel views China as America’s primary enemy. He has called it a “semi-fascist, semi-communist gerontocracy” and pushed for complete economic decoupling. Interestingly, Thiel is far less hostile to Russia, which he sees as culturally closer to the West. In his view, pushing Moscow into Beijing’s arms is a strategic mistake.

The Dark Enlightenment

The final group behind the New America are the theorists of the ‘Dark Enlightenment’, or neo-reactionary movement. These intellectual provocateurs reject the Enlightenment values that once defined the West.

Nick Land, a British philosopher living in Shanghai, is among the founding thinkers of this school. He predicts the end of humanity as we know it and the rise of posthuman, techno-authoritarian systems governed by capital and machines. For Land, morality is irrelevant; what matters is efficiency, evolution, and raw power.

Curtis Yarvin (aka Mencius Moldbug), an American programmer, is another central figure. A friend of Thiel and an insider in Trump’s intellectual circle, Yarvin advocates replacing democracy with a corporate-style monarchy. He imagines a future of sovereign city-states run like companies, where experimentation with laws and technologies is unrestricted.

Yarvin is clear in his rejection of American global leadership. He believes the US should withdraw from Europe and let regional powers settle their own disputes. He speaks warmly of China, and his views on World War II are unorthodox to say the least – suggesting Hitler was motivated by strategic calculation rather than genocidal ambition.

What comes next?

Many of these ideas may seem fringe. But fringe ideas have power – especially when they echo through the corridors of political and technological influence. Carl Schmitt’s legal theories enabled Hitler to seize dictatorial powers in 1933. Today, the intellectual allies of Trump and Thiel are crafting their own narratives of ‘emergency’, ‘decadence’, and ‘reawakening’.

What’s emerging in America is not a retreat from hegemony, but a reformatting of it. The liberal international order is no longer seen as sacred – even by the country that built it. The new American elite may be withdrawing troops from Europe, the Middle East, and Korea, but their ambitions have not shrunk. They are turning instead to subtler methods of control: AI, cyber dominance, ideological warfare, and technological superiority.

Their goal is not a multipolar world, but a redesigned unipolar one – run not by diplomats and treaties, but by algorithms, monopolies, and machines.

The threat to the world is not just political anymore. It is civilizational. The superhumans are on the march.

 

This article was first published by Russia in Global Affairs, translated and edited by the RT team

 

https://www.rt.com/news/621702-ideology-behind-new-america/

 

YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT.

 

         Gus Leonisky

         POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.

a band of robbers....

 

Once again like a band of robbers – and the “collective West” nods in agreement

by Karl-Jürgen Müller

 

More than 20 years ago, when a “coalition of the willing” led by the United States had just launched a war of aggression against Iraq in violation of international law, we quoted for the first time the Church Father Augustine and his timeless comparison of an imperialist state (“empire”) with a band of robbers. At that time, we had high hopes that serious violations of the law by the state would not leave civilised people indifferent.
  Today, we refer to this again, quoting Augustine in full:

 

Justice being taken away, then, what are kingdoms but great robberies? For what are robberies themselves, but little kingdoms? The band itself is made up of men; it is ruled by the authority of a prince, it is knit together by the pact of the confederacy; the booty is divided by the law agreed on. If, by the admittance of abandoned men, this evil increases to such a degree that it holds places, fixes abodes, takes possession of cities, and subdues peoples, it assumes the more plainly the name of a kingdom, because the reality is now manifestly conferred on it, not by the removal of covetousness, but by the addition of impunity. Indeed, that was an apt and true reply which was given to Alexander the Great by a pirate who had been seized. For when that king had asked the man what he meant by keeping hostile possession of the sea, he answered with bold pride, What you mean by seizing the whole earth; but because I do it with a petty ship, I am called a robber, while you who does it with a great fleet are styled emperor. (De Civitate Dei, 4th book; chapter 4)

 

Following the bombing of Iran by the US Air Force and US Navy on 22 June in violation of international law, and the ceasefire between Israel and Iran announced by the US President on social media just one day later, this President celebrated himself as a peacemaker and allowed himself to be celebrated. The whole process is reminiscent of a grotesque spectacle, a mixture of absurd madness and cruel tyranny. Was it not the same president who made Israel’s war crimes possible in the first place and provided massive support for them? How can such a US president allow himself to be praised as a peacemaker after having previously promoted war? It is reminiscent of the Wild West.
  But that is just an aside.
  The alarm must be sounded again because the renewed US breach of international law (the UN Charter’s prohibition of violence with the sole exception of self-defence) is hardly causing any public outrage in the West anymore. On the contrary, international law is increasingly being ignored if not openly relativised.
  I reviewed the extensive national and international press review of the public broadcaster Deutschlandfunk from 23 to 25 June and, with one exception, found no mainstream Western voice addressing this blatant breach of law. Newspaper commentaries range from open approval of this war of aggression violating international law, to certain realpolitik concerns. The only exception was the “Nürnberger Zeitung” on 24 June, which at least stated that Trump’s act of war “creates fear rather than friends beyond Israel because it ignores international law. If world politics remains so reckless, it will soon be worthless, like the paper on which it was so hopefully recorded after the Second World War.”
  The statement issued by the Russian Foreign Ministry on 22 June, excerpts of which are reproduced here, was also appropriate:

Russia strongly condemns the attacks by the United States on several nuclear facilities in the Islamic Republic of Iran, which were carried out in the early hours of 22 June following the recent attacks by Israel.
  This reckless decision to launch missile and air strikes on the territory of a sovereign state, regardless of the justifications put forward, constitutes a flagrant violation of international law, the Charter of the United Nations and the relevant resolutions of the United Nations Security Council, which has consistently and unequivocally condemned such actions as unacceptable. Particularly worrying is the fact that the attacks were carried out by a permanent member of the United Nations Security Council.1

And from which country does the following comment originate?

Some politicians in Europe and the United States supporting the attack on Iran have succumbed to the illusion that this war will be the last war in the Middle East. This illusion has become so deeply ingrained in the minds of some politicians that they are regarding the attack on Iran and the violation of international rules as “dirty work”. They even show gratitude because the burden of this dirty work is being taken off their shoulders. Such thinking spells the end of morality and humanity.

This was reported in the Tehran newspaper “Shargh” on 23 June. Incidentally, this is not a newspaper close to the government, but one of the political opposition in the country.
  There are good reasons to doubt that the Middle East has moved closer to peace as a result of what Donald Trump has called the “12-day war”. Israel and its allies continue to push for regime change in Iran and what they call the “New Middle East”2. There are too many indications that this is only a brief respite – and not even that for Israel’s immediate neighbours. Relations have been poisoned too deeply. Western interests in the total colonisation of this region of the world are too tangible.
  Our mainstream media continue to fan the flames. On 25 June, the foreign policy editor of the “Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung” wrote in a commentary: “It is rather unlikely that in such a large country [as Iran], the regime controlling the essential institutions could be overthrown by air strikes alone. But a prolonged war would put the clerical-military ruling system under severe pressure, especially if it were conducted with American participation.” Similarly, the editor-in-chief of the bellicose “Neue Zürcher Zeitung” on 27 June (https://www.nzz.ch/meinung/trumps-angriff-auf-iran-ist-eine-chance-fuer-den-nahen-osten-ld.1890743; also “Neue Zürcher Zeitung” of 28 June 2025).
  The question remains whether we citizens are willing to accept the continuing unabated warmongering of our governments, their henchmen and the interest groups behind them with their propaganda of enemy stereotypes and their arms obsession – as is now the case again with NATO’s decision to massively increase military spending.
  So that we and our children will almost certainly be led to the slaughter again in the 21st century.
  Or if we ourselves will actively campaign for more peace in the world and support those who are already committed to peace – for an unbiased, realistic analysis of the world situation, against enemy stereotypes and warmongering, for diplomacy and international understanding. •

https://www.zeit-fragen.ch/en/archives/2025/nr-15-8-juli-2025/erneut-wie-eine-raeuberbande-und-der-kollektive-westen-nickt-dazu

 

 

READ FROM TOP.

 

YOURDEMOCRACY.NET RECORDS HISTORY AS IT SHOULD BE — NOT AS THE WESTERN MEDIA WRONGLY REPORTS IT.

 

         Gus Leonisky

         POLITICAL CARTOONIST SINCE 1951.