Sunday 19th of May 2024
Home » Blogs » Gus Leonisky's blog

weird election campaigns.....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5hqR15v1uVI

Jesse Watters: Biden is running scared

 

 

The Kennedy dream’: Inside Robert F. Kennedy Jr’s run for the presidency    Vaccine critic RFK Jr has gone from ‘troubled life’ to candidate for the top job. Here’s why his rivals are paying attention. [GUSNOTE: TRUMP DOES NOT CARE, BUT BIDEN IS SCARED OF RFK...]    By Angus Holland and Jackson Graham

 

The life of Robert F. Kennedy Jr took an odd turn in 2005. Possibly because of his own son’s nut allergy or possibly because, as he would later say, other parents had been approaching him with concerns, he became worried that vaccines might be the cause of a spike in childhood neurological disorders.

This was not new territory. The British doctor Andrew Wakefield had already made waves in 1998 for his claims that the MMR (combined measles) vaccine was linked to a rise in autism cases. He was subsequently found to have fraudulently falsified his research and was banned from practising medicine.

But the notion that some vaccines were a danger that was being covered up by “the establishment” was conspiracy catnip for Kennedy, nephew of president John F. Kennedy (JFK) and son of former United States attorney-general Robert F. Kennedy.

RFK Jr, who until that point had a storied record as an environmental lawyer, dived into the topic with zeal, sharing his findings in Rolling Stone magazine and the website Salon. “I devoted time to study this issue because I believe that this is a moral crisis that must be addressed,” he wrote, quoting one activist as telling him: “The damage caused by vaccine exposure is massive. It’s bigger than asbestos, bigger than tobacco, bigger than anything you’ve ever seen.” His research, though, was problematic, and the story had to be corrected several times after publication. It was later disavowed entirely.

But the die was cast. Kennedy shrugged off the criticisms and doubled down on his vaccination theories, which helped propel him, nearly 20 years later, to run for president of the United States. His constituents are a curious coalition of anti-vaxxers, Bitcoin evangelists, libertarians, disaffected Democrats, manosphere podcasters and those old enough to still remember, misty-eyed, the golden years of the Kennedy family’s “Camelot”.

Dismissed by some as a no-chance crank when he announced his campaign in 2023, RFK Jr has lately been polling strongly enough to be taken seriously, with around 12 per cent of the popular vote: not enough to win the presidency, but not nothing. If he sticks around until polling day, he could certainly swing the result in a close race towards Biden or Trump. Which is why they are paying attention.

Who is RFK Jr? 

“The Kennedys, for a long time but not any more, per se, were considered the royal family of the United States,” explains Thomas Whalen, a presidential historian at Boston University. RFK Jr is a member of the third generation of the Kennedy dynasty. He was nine when JFK was assassinated in a motorcade in Dallas in 1963, and 14 when his father was shot in a Los Angeles hotel after claiming a win in pursuit of the Democratic presidential nomination in 1968.

“He was in the hospital after his uncle had been shot, and at 14, he was a pallbearer for his father,” says David Nasaw, an emeritus professor at the City University of New York, who has interviewed several Kennedys including RFK Jr. “From that point on, he lived the most troubled life.”

RFK Jr veered into drug addiction in his teens and 20s, and was eventually sentenced to two years probation for possessing heroin after he fell ill in an aeroplane toilet in 1983. To satisfy the conditions of his probation, he volunteered for the environmental activist group the Natural Resources Defence Council, a turning point.

“We talked about [the addiction episode] at some length,” says Dick Russell, a long-time friend of Kennedy and author of the recent biography The Real RFK Jr: Trials of a Truth Warrior. “He felt that this was, you know, a struggle that had really shaped his life in the sense that he was able to recover and become an environmental lawyer. He was somebody who had been through a lot of tough times. And he had been able to not just maintain himself but become a stronger person.”

In 1995, New York Magazine called him “The Kennedy Who Matters” amid a push to protect the city’s water supply. In 1999, Time named him a “hero of the planet” for his work at the not-for-profit Riverkeeper. Career highs included cleaning up the notoriously polluted Hudson River; a battle to close the nuclear power plant Indian Point; and work to defeat dams in Chile and Peru. He spent a month in prison in 2001 for protesting against US naval exercises on a Puerto Rican island; in 2013, he was arrested and fined in Washington, DC, with one of his seven children, son Conor, while rallying against the extension of an oil pipeline between Canada and the US.

His early career in public life fits a well-trodden path in the Kennedy family. His grandfather, Joseph P. Kennedy – an investor whom Fortune placed in the top 16 wealthiest US individuals in 1957 – was US ambassador to Britain and intended for his fortune to enable his family to pursue public life. Ted Kennedy, another of RFK Jr’s uncles, was elected to the Senate nine times. His aunt, Eunice Kennedy Shriver, founded the Special Olympics. “None of them went into business or tried to make money,” Nasaw tells us. “It was mostly the same with the next generation, the grandchildren.”

Of RFK Jr’s 10 siblings, two have entered politics. His cousin, Caroline Kennedy, is the US ambassador to Australia. Meanwhile, the Kennedy family connection with what used to be called “the jet set” endures (think Marylin Monroe; Jackie Kennedy-Onassis). RFK Jr is married for the third time, to actress Cheryl Hines, who played the wife of Larry David in the TV comedy series Curb Your Enthusiasm. Son Conor briefly dated Taylor Swift. In RFK Jr’s home office in Los Angeles, he reportedly has a stuffed tiger (a gift to his father from Sukarno, the first president of Indonesia) and a stuffed bat from the actress Glenn Close, godmother to one of his two daughters.

 

“He has been brought up as a Kennedy to believe in himself,” says Nasaw, “to believe that he’s the smartest, most charming man in any room.” But there is also something different – a tendency to view events through the prism of conspiracy and corruption. “He has this brooding intensity.”

When he visited RFK Jr for an interview in the early 2000s, Nasaw was impressed. “I didn’t sense anything out of the ordinary,” he says. Then Kennedy gave Nasaw a book to read. He was surprised to later find it was a “super-conspiracy theory” that blamed the CIA and US Defence Department for JFK’s assassination. “I’m a historian, and I know all this literature backwards and forwards, and I’d never heard of this book,” Nasaw says. “It was more outlandish than anything I’d read.” Nasaw says this is a worrying mix. “There’s a hubris and egotism that’s taking him beyond bounds.”

https://www.smh.com.au/world/north-america/the-kennedy-dream-inside-robert-f-kennedy-jr-s-run-for-the-presidency-20240502-p5fogi.html

 

GUSNOTE: I WILL STOP HERE BECAUSE AS SOON AS SOMEONE SAYS SOMETHING LIKE “There’s a hubris and egotism that’s taking him beyond bounds.” WITHOUT PUKING ABOUT THE OTHER TWO NUTTY CANDIDATES, YOU KNOW SOMEONE IS SAYING SOMETHING CROOKED... BUT KENNEDY JR MAIN FAILING IS TO SUPPORT ISRAHELL... HIS VIEWS OF COVID COULD BE HIS BEST CHANCE...

 

 FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW...............

 

future-proof...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t49q0P7Qs04

Aaron Maté : Kharkiv Under Fire. Russia Increases Attacks

 

MAKE A DEAL PRONTO BEFORE THE SHIT HITS THE FAN:

 

 

NO NATO IN "UKRAINE" (WHAT'S LEFT OF IT)

THE DONBASS REPUBLICS ARE NOW BACK IN THE RUSSIAN FOLD — AS THEY USED TO BE PRIOR 1922. THE RUSSIANS WON'T ABANDON THESE AGAIN.

THESE WILL ALSO INCLUDE ODESSA, KHERSON AND KHARKIV.....

CRIMEA IS RUSSIAN — AS IT USED TO BE PRIOR 1954

TRANSNISTRIA WILL BE PART OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION.

A MEMORANDUM OF NON-AGGRESSION BETWEEN RUSSIA AND THE USA.

 

EASY.

 

THE WEST KNOWS IT.

 

READ FROM TOP

 

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW....

 

not only donald.....

 

Communist Coup (Cont.): Black Female Judge Yvette Roland Trashes Key Anglo-American Legal Principles to Lynch Trump Lawyer John Eastman      BY 

 

I imagine most observers across the political spectrum would agree (on the Left, perhaps discreetly) that another four years with the White House controlled by the Biden puppet masters will cement the Great Replacement. The objective of the Democrats’ (actually quite long-established) No Borders policy will be achieved.

America will be ruled by a small ideologically unified elite, most of whose ancestors were thousands of miles distant when America was formed and established. They will utilize the resentments of a mass of variously colored peoples to oppress the Historic American Nation and complete the destruction of its institutions.

At VDARE.com’s recent conference, Scott Greer gave a fine exposition on this matter.

But the Anti-Americans are already hard at work abolishing an ancient Anglo-American right: that to have legal representation when tried. This is the real significance of John Eastman’s judicial lynching in California. There, a remarkably injudicious judge, Yvette D Roland, has ruled he should be disbarred because he represented President Trump [Judge recommends ex-Trump election lawyer John Eastman be disbarred, CNN, March 27, 2024].

The concept that a lawyer is at risk because of the character of his client has long been rubbished in Anglo-American jurisprudence. If accepted, it would make many defendants too risky to represent.

Until recently, discussion of this potentially momentous case by non-Left publications has been shamefully scarce. But last week there appeared The Unpersoning of John Eastman [by TJ Harker, The American Mind, May 2, 2024].

This is a thorough account of Judge Roland’s wildly biased behavior and succinctly raises what I see as the key issue. Harker comments:

More than 200 years ago, John Adams defended the legal rights of unpopular British sailors [sic, actually soldiers] wrongfully accused of murder. At the time, he was criticized by his fellow countrymen. But history weighed in, and for the ensuing two centuries, Americans in general and lawyers in particular celebrated Adams for his courageous defense of politically unpopular defendants. We held Adams up as an exemplar of legal courage.

The link here is to The Rule of Law Depends on John Eastman [by Mark Pulliam, tomklingenstein.com, April 23, 2024. This gives a much more extensive account of the brave action of  John Adams (who was after all a major Patriot leader). Of the Eastman case, Pulliam says:

Eastman is not the only victim of lawfare, but his case is the most compelling. The left is making an example of him, warning center-right lawyers not to represent Republican candidates in future election disputes—or else … it is impossible to fairly conclude that Eastman’s advice went beyond good faith, zealous advocacy…

But the motives of Eastman’s critics are not driven by the merits. His only “crime” was representing a client the left despises.

[Link in original]

Last month, The Gatestone Institute extensively interviewed John Eastman. On April 21, they posted  ’The Most Secure Election in American History.’ZeroHedge reproduced it the next day with some of their useful characteristic bolding.

This sprawling (11,800 word) interview is a treasure trove for those interested in an insight into the 2020 election fraud coverup. Also for examples of judicial misbehavior in the Stalinesque Show Trails of the Biden era.

Judge Roland has apparently never heard of the principle of the Right to Representation. Otherwise she would have stopped the trial at the opening.

This of course conforms to the pattern set by the recent declaration by New York’s Abena Darkeh, another black female judge, that the Second Amendment did not exist in her courtroom.

(Appearances somewhat to the contrary, Judge Roland does indeed identify as black. In 2008-9 she was the 34th president of the Black Women Lawyers Association of Los Angeles).

So the trial devolved into a row about whether Eastman was justified in associating himself with his client’s contention that the 2020 election was fraudulent. Here Roland adopted a technique seen in other of the Trump Show Trials: blocking the defendant from bringing in favorable evidence and testimony.

There were several examples, but this is the prize: Eastman says

She has already blocked about a dozen of my witnesses, but… We have a guy named Joseph Fried, retired CPA, professional auditor…

He said something doesn’t smell right here, and so he applied his tools of the trade to look at the elections and wrote a book called Debunked.It’s a brilliant book. I told my wife, “This is the book I would have written if I hadn’t been on my heels playing defense the last year.“

The book was written and published in January of 2023, so the judge ruled it was not relevant because, even though it discusses all the evidence I had before me, the analysis he did was after the fact and I could not have relied on it, therefore it was not relevant.

Two days later, the government offers a witness to introduce into evidence government reports that were done in September 2022. My lawyer objected, “It’s not relevant on your prior ruling.“ The lawyer for the bar actually said, “Well, these are government reports. They are different.“ So the judge let them in.

This of course refers to Debunked?: An auditor reviews the 2020 election—and the lessons learned, by Joseph Fried. This book is imperative (if daunting) reading for anyone who wants to know what happened in 2020. I synopsized Debunked in Yes, Virginia (Dare): The 2020 Election WAS Fraudulent—And GA GOP Leadership (Among Others) Are Complicit.

(Eastman is scathing about the behavior of the Georgia Republicans in the election. To me, they appear to be old line partisan Democrats, driven out of their party by Atlanta’s Black/Loonie Left alliance.)

Another legal principle Judge Roland felt able to disregard: recusal. In Joseph Fried, Author Of Definitive Election Fraud Book DEBUNKED, Audits Trump Case Judges. They Fail, I quoted Joe Fried citing the Cornell Law School:

According to the Cornell Law School,

Recusal is not just a matter of ethics: It is a constitutional requirement.

“The Due Process clauses of the United States Constitution requirejudges to recuse themselves from cases in two situations:

    1. Where the judge has a financial interest in the case’s outcome.
    2. Where there is otherwise a strong possibility that the judge’s decision will be biased.

…What matters is that even if the judge is not biased, the high probability of bias still damages the integrity of the judicial system.

In addition to being a Democratic contributor both before and after becoming a Judge, Roland, according to her law firm bio 

…served as an Immigration Law Counselor at the UCLA Office of International Students & Scholars…

A poor lookout for Eastman, who after all was defending Donald Trump, described by Scott Greer at the VDARE.com conference as the best President on immigration since Eisenhower. Particularly, as Eastman told Gatestone:

When President Trump…walked down that famous escalator at Trump Tower, one of the planks in his campaign platform was that we need to fix this problem of birthright citizenship…

In his next press conference, he waved a law review article, and said there is a very serious argument that our Constitution does not mandate birthright citizenship. That happened to be my law review article on birthright citizenship.

Even closer to the purported subject matter of the trial: California Judge Who Disbarred Trump’s Former Attorney John Eastman Funneled Money to Super PAC Fighting Election Integrity [by Rachel Alexander, Arizona Sun Times, April 22, 2024]:

California disciplinary court Judge Yvette Roland… contributed to a Democratic PAC last year which funneled all of the contributions to a Super PAC that seeks to stop “undermining the most basic tenet of our democracy, the right to vote.” Despite the fact that the charges against Eastman were all related to his efforts investigating and stopping election corruption in the 2020 election, Roland did not recuse herself.

This has become a pattern in the Trump-related Judicial pogroms: consider Judge Merchan.

As early as the first day of the trial, in CAN JOHN EASTMAN GET A FAIR TRIAL?, June 20, 2023 Powerline’s Steven Hayward realized it was going to be an atrocity

…the Alice-in-Wonderland character of “sentence first, verdict after” became readily apparent.

The behavior of the presiding judge, Yvette Roland, was startling. Several times during the direct examination by the State Bar lawyer Duncan Carling, Judge Roland intervened to challenge Eastman on his answer, rather than leaving it to Carling to follow up … She was questioning Eastman more aggressively than the Bar counsel. It was two against one…

In Democrats’ Campaign To Disbar John Eastman Is Designed To Criminalize Republican Election Challenges [The Federalist, October 25, 2023], Shawn Fleetwood has a whole section called ”A Rigged Trial” listing examples of Roland’s wild and partisan behavior:

In one instance, Roland allowed the [State Bar Commission] to call witnesses such as Stephen Richer to testify despite having no relevance to the trial … Eastman’s legal team pressed Roland about why she was permitting “the SBC’s witnesses like Richer to present one side but not allowing Eastman’s witnesses to testify on the same topic.” Roland refused to change her mind.

But unfortunately this atrocity is rooted deeper that in the intellectual and moral failings one woman, although Yvette Roland has certainly earned her place in VDARE.com’s tag category “Black Women Abusing Power.”

She is just a useful idiot.

In his Gatestone interview, John Eastman says

…there is a group in DC, largely hard-liner partisan Democrats… but joined by a couple of hard-line never-Trump Republicans, or one, so they can claim they are bipartisan. The group is called The 65 Project…

The 65 Project was formed—I think I’ve seen reported that they received a grant from a couple of George Soros-related organizations of $100 million—to bring disbarment actions against all of the lawyers who were involved in any of those cases.

The head of the organization gave an interview to Axios… and he said…the group’s goal with respect to the Trump election lawyers is to ”not only bring the grievances in the bar complaints, but shame them and make them toxic in their communities and in their firms” ”in order to deter right-wing legal talent from signing on to any future GOP efforts” to challenge elections.

The Axios article Scoop: High-powered group targets Trump lawyers’ livelihoods [by Lachlan Markay and Jonathan Swan, March 7, 2022] is actually quite balanced, quoting Paul Davis, a Texas attorney, saying Project 65 is an effort:

to neutralize anyone on the right with the ability to stand in the way of the left’s efforts to hide malfeasance in the 2020 elections and to clear the path for a repeat of similar malfeasance…

and quoting adviser David Brock making clear Project 65’s objective is political terrorism:

”I think the littler fish are probably more vulnerable to what we’re doing,” Brock said. ”You’re threatening their livelihood. And, you know, they’ve got reputations in their local communities.”

This effort will not be confined to elections. And the big law firms are already Leftist strongholds.

Influence WATCH says of Project 65:

It is a project of Law Works, a group with no website or public financial disclosures.

That this horde of lawyers should suddenly erupt to eliminate the traditional Right to Representation proves that VDARE.com Editor Peter Brimelow was right: Trump’s Indictment—Like I Said, This Is A Communist Coup

As I have said previously:

Perhaps the most important service of the Trump Administration: demonstrating the startling news that the FBI is controlled by extremely unscrupulous Leftist activists. Perhaps the most important service of the 2020 Presidential Election: demonstrating that the state and Federal judiciary is packed with unrestrained Leftist partisans.

The plan is to pervert the Judicial system into the enforcement mechanism of a Police State. John Eastman’s case (and Donald Trump’s cases) are canaries in the coal mine.

(As of course is VDARE.com’s persecution by New York Attorney General Letitia James.)

The GOP, and the American people, need to wake up.

John Eastman’s GiveSendGo appeal is here.

 

https://www.unz.com/article/communist-coup-cont-black-female-judge-yvette-roland-trashes-key-anglo-american-legal-principles-to-lynch-trump-lawyer-john-eastman/

 

 

READ FROM TOP

 

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW....

 

THE AMERICAN JUSTICE SYSTEM IS A MAZE OF SLANTED CRAP....

seriously....

US independent presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has challenged former President Donald Trump to a debate at this month’s Libertarian National Convention. Trump insists that Kennedy is “not a serious candidate.”

“I’d like to make you an offer. We’re both going to be speaking at the upcoming Libertarian convention on May 24 and 25,” Kennedy wrote in an X (formerly Twitter) post on Tuesday addressed to Trump. “It’s perfect neutral territory for you and me to have a debate where you can defend your record for your wavering supporters.”

Asked last week whether he would debate Kennedy, Trump said that the former Democrat is “not a serious candidate” and would have to “get his numbers a lot higher before he’s credible.”

In his post on Tuesday, Kennedy claimed that a poll commissioned by his campaign showed that he would “crush” President Joe Biden in a two-way contest, and would defeat Trump “in a nail-biter” in a similar matchup. Polls published last month by CNN and Quinnipiac both showed Kennedy at 16% in a contest involving him, Trump, Biden, and other independents, a result that he argued puts him “above the 15% debate threshold.”

READ MORE: Biden a ‘threat to democracy’ – RFK Jr

“I’m also drawing a lot of voters from your former supporters. They are upset that you blew up the deficit, shut down their businesses during Covid, and filled your administration with swamp creatures,” Kennedy wrote. 

Known for his anti-vaccine activism, free-speech advocacy, and foreign policy pacifism, Kennedy entered the race for the White House as a Democrat last April, before announcing in October that he would run as an independent instead. His effect on this November’s election has proven difficult for pundits to predict, with polls showing him pulling support from both Biden and Trump.

“The Democrats are frightened that I’m gonna spoil the election for President Biden, and the Republicans are frightened that I’m gonna spoil it for President Trump,”Kennedy said last year. “The truth is, they’re both right. My intention is to spoil it for both of them.”

Trump and Kennedy will both deliver headline speeches at the Libertarian Party’s convention in Washington DC later this month, despite the fact that the party also intends to field its own candidate for the presidency. 

In a statement last week, Trump encouraged Libertarian Party members to back his campaign. “If Libertarians join me and the Republican Party, where we have many Libertarian views, the election won’t even be close,” he said. “We cannot have another four years of death, destruction, and incompetence. WE WILL WORK TOGETHER AND WIN!”

 

https://www.rt.com/news/597182-rfk-trump-debate-challenge/

 

UNFORTUNATELY FOR RFK JUNIOR, HE SUPPORTS ISRAEL 100 PER CENT.... THIS IS CRAP LIBERALISM.

 

READ FROM TOP

 

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW....

 

 

no condom...

Porn star Stormy Daniels described her 2006 encounter with Donald Trump in unflattering terms at his criminal trial in New York on Tuesday, testifying she tried not to think about the sex while it took place and feared it would become public.

For several hours, Daniels, 45, offered details on the witness stand about her encounter with the former U.S. president, 77, and the hush-money deal she reached to stay quiet about it ahead of the 2016 election, when he won the White House.

She told jurors that her life descended into "chaos" after the arrangement was made public in 2018, saying she was ostracized and harassed at her home.

"Who do you understand Mr. Trump to be referring to as 'horseface' and 'sleazebag' in this post?" prosecutor Susan Hoffinger asked Daniels as she displayed a social media post by Trump.

"Me," Daniels replied.

Questioned by Trump's lawyer, Daniels said she hates Trump and hopes he goes to jail if found guilty.

Daniels's testimony prompted Trump's legal team to ask for a mistrial, arguing that her account included details — such as the fact that Trump did not wear a condom — that "inflamed" the jury and were irrelevant to the case.

Justice Juan Merchan denied the request.

Trump, the presumed Republican nominee in this year's presidential election, did not react as he watched Daniels testify. He has pleaded not guilty to charges of falsifying business records to cover up a $130,000 US hush-money payment to Daniels and denies ever having sex with her.

His legal team has suggested that Daniels was angling for a spot on The Apprentice, a popular reality TV show then hosted by Trump, a New York real estate mogul.

Daniels confirmed that she hoped he would cast her on the show following their encounter. Asked by Trump's lawyer if she was now making money off her story, she replied: "I've been making money by telling my story about what happened to me."

Daniels says she 'blacked out' before sex

Daniels said Trump made sexual advances after inviting her to his hotel suite at a celebrity golf tournament in Lake Tahoe, Nev. Daniels testified she grew up as the daughter of a low-income single mother.

She said Trump told her: "This is the only way you're getting out of the trailer park."

Daniels said she "blacked out" despite consuming no drugs or alcohol after Trump prevented her from leaving the room by blocking the door. She said she woke up on the bed with her clothes off.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/trump-trial-stormy-daniels-testimony-1.7196539

 

WE SUPPOSE STORMY BECAME A PORN STAR AFTER TRUMP'S LOUSY PERFORMANCE — REALISING THERE WAS MONEY (BLACKMAIL AND PROFFESSIONAL) IN SHOWING ONE'S "UGLY" ARSE BEING F**K IN VARIOUS POSES.... APPARENTLY SHE SIGNED SOME LETTERS SAYING SHE NEVER HAD SEX WITH TRUMP... METHINKS THAT AS "SHE HATES DONALD" (PROBABLY ON BEHALF OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY) SHE COULD HAVE SET UP A WAY TO EXTORT SOME CASH FROM TRUMP (UNKNOWINGLY FROM HIM) AND SHARING SOME OF IT WITH COHEN... ONE THING FOR SURE, SHE CAN LIE....

 

OH... AND BY THE WAY.... ANY BUSINESSMAN (PERSON) KNOWS THAT PAYING HUSH MONEY NEVER WORKS AND POLITICIANS (AND THE CIA) KNOW THAT THE ONLY WAY TO KEEP SECRETS IS TO KILL THE PEOPLE WHO KNOW...

 

SEE ALSO: 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v03UyOu_g4Q

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=alSSeS0QDzI

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OIsog-cB9bc

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pd5N5NlnmOU

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AFaUfX0ZUfk

 

 

READ FROM TOP

 

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW....

signatures....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dkALn5zVLj0

CONFIRMED: Stormy Daniels Is A LIAR & Judge Jeanine Destroys Kangaroo Court!

 

 

READ FROM TOP

 

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW....

stormy lies....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UevyHSXL3go

Megyn Kelly Brings Receipts on Stormy Daniels' Inconsistencies on the Stand and in Past Interviews

 

CAN STORMY REMEMBER ALL THE GUYS SHE HAD SEX WITH, AND WHICHEVER POSITIONS, OR CAN SHE MIX THEM UP FOR SHOW? 

 

 

READ FROM TOP

 

FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW....